MajorCharlesRane
Member
Ok, that's more like it.
On the other hand.....I think some of you are falling too much in line with the whole media nonsense about how Texas will be hard-pressed to win without Beltre. His absence is being greatly overblown. Of course his loss will be felt and the chances of winning are better with him in the lineup. But he's just 1 guy out of 9. He's not superhuman. He has gone 0 for 4 plenty of times and we still won. We've still got Choo, Mitch, Elvis, and Odor, and possibly could get contributions from Josh, Prince, DDJ, and Gimenez.
The loss of Beltre does not mean Hamels absolutely has to throw a gem now to win. 4 of our 5 runs yesterday had nothing to do with Adrian Beltre. We won without him. We can certainly do it again today.
Not even close but neither is the offense.Hamels just isn't good enough today.
3 runs in 5 innings without Beltre. The offense isn't the problem.On the other hand.....
You're right, but you could make the argument that we'd be up 3-1 if he were in there3 runs in 5 innings without Beltre. The offense isn't the problem.
Hamels isn't pitching well. Even with Alberto's 1 error, the Rangers should be winning this game. Adrian Beltre is not a necessity for the Rangers to win this game.
Wrong. But Adrian not there is not necessary if Hamsls pitches well.3 runs in 5 innings without Beltre. The offense isn't the problem.
Hamels isn't pitching well. Even with Alberto's 1 error, the Rangers should be winning this game. Adrian Beltre is not a necessity for the Rangers to win this game.