Will Khalil Mack Get Traded

[SteelersPride]

Send Bell and swap......

he costs more than bell

 

[Pure Steel]

he costs more than bell

I know, would have been nice to have gotten something for him before he bolts.....

 

[SteelersPride]

I know, would have been nice to have gotten something for him before he bolts.....

yet mack needs a contract too, so he could bolt

 

[Inimical]

I believe the Raiders can still force him to play two more years. If he sits out he leaves almost 30 million i believe on the table. They will let him sit. In two years he will be two years older. They can trade him in at any point really. Though i think most likely they will push the Packers for two first rounders. If not, he sits. Until he realizes he makes 800k a game. Everything is in the Raiders favor.

 

[Ojb81]

I believe the Raiders can still force him to play two more years. If he sits out he leaves almost 30 million i believe on the table. They will let him sit. In two years he will be two years older. They can trade him in at any point really. Though i think most likely they will push the Packers for two first rounders. If not, he sits. Until he realizes he makes 800k a game. Everything is in the Raiders favor.

lol, no way do the raiders think they're getting two 1st-rounders from ANYONE for khalil mack.

 

[fastforward]

...In two years he will be two years older...

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

lol, no way do the raiders think they're getting two 1st-rounders from ANYONE for khalil mack.

No chance, I wouldn't give up one

Great player in spurts that tends to dissapear for a few games

 

[ATL96Steeler]

also steelers are listed here, and he costs way too much for us, even if we have a need at that position

1st he'd have to play for something less than $100 mil, but if they trade Dupree and whack Bell, (next yr Haden) they can pay him $18 to 20 mil per.

Of course we know that ain't happening, but one can dream!

 

[poprocksncoke]

no

 

[The Derski]

no

Green and Yellow baby

 

[Judge Fudge]

Green and Blue baby

Damn @The Derski

I don't know that you where a 12

 

[Fountain City Blues]

No chance, I wouldn't give up one

Great player in spurts that tends to dissapear for a few games

An all-pro level edge?

 

[Fountain City Blues]

“I wouldn’t give up multiple 1sts for a HOF level talent with 3 years of control”

-SportsHoopla

 

[Rock Strongo]

No chance, I wouldn't give up one

Great player in spurts that tends to dissapear for a few games

hes a sack per game guy (.9107) in wins

drops to a .41/game in losses

his best sack months is december, 17 sacks in 17 games.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

hes a sack per game guy (.9107) in wins

drops to a .41/game in losses

his best sack months is december, 17 sacks in 17 games.

He’s doing that on an awful scheme/D as well.

 

[Rock Strongo]

He’s doing that on an awful scheme/D as well.

yeah, so he does do well when it counts it seems.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

yeah, so he does do well when it counts it seems.

Mack if he was actually playing with a lead on a D that wasn’t bunk...

Or just with Rodgers. That’d change the NFC significantly.

 

[Rock Strongo]

Mack if he was actually playing with a lead on a D that wasn’t bunk...

Or just with Rodgers. That’d change the NFC significantly.

give him a lead on a good offensive team and let him go to work on D.

 

[Fountain City Blues]

give him a lead on a good offensive team and let him go to work on D.

Yeah, he’d be a major major issue on a revamped Packer D.

This all assumes Gruden goes full McDaniels with a side of Mark Davis having no liquidity.

 

[LUNCHBOX]

Mack is on the cusp of becoming a big star, the Raiders would be wise to keep him IMO.

Cusp? He made all pro in the same season at outside linebacker and D-end....first player ever for that....also former DPOY in 2016.....I love the guy , but if he wont report, trade him for picks