- Thread starter
- #1
averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
There was a 2016 NBC Sports article that said...
Before that there was a 2014 SB Nation post that calculated the first 3 rounds of 5 drafts (from 2010 thru 2014) and said that the league average of starters was 61%.
This is my first year as a dynasty owner. And in a few months I will be having my first rookie dynasty draft. I have no idea how to approach it? Really.
I say that because a typical QB may take years to develop. Though you wouldn't get the impression by looking at Dak Prescott's 2016 season. But there are plenty of other QB who are up and down (mostly down) for a newbie. So to me, drafting a QB is somewhat of a risk. Unless you want to see a player sit idle on your roster for a full season or more.
Then there are RB. Sure Ezekiel Elliott may have tore it up this year. But as fantasy owners, we know this certainly doesn't apply to every RB drafted. In fact, here are ALL the RB drafted in 2016 after Elliott through round 5:
As you can see, the potential may be there, but arguably, of this group Jordan Howard is the only one paying weekly dividends to fantasy owners at this point. The rest are still wait-and-see. I don't like those odds.
And let's not forget that the shelf-life of RB is short. Unless they are a stud. According to Statista, the average career of an NFL RB is 2.57 years. That's the shortest of all NFL careers. Which also means that if you draft a rookie RB and he fails to start or become the starter by the end of the season, chances are, he will be yet another sporadic or idle player taking up valuable space on your roster.
Which brings us to WR. (Yes, I'm purposely ignoring the TE position.) In the pass-happy NFL, they seem to be the player to draft. But not if you look at the mostly-pathetic group of WR drafted in 2016:
Again... No idea.
And I get that you need to look at everything when deciding. You might consider the offense. Potential usage. The incumbent players. But that's still no guarantee.
Maybe I should just trade all of my picks for veterans?
I welcome your views. Please share.
“According to our most recent statistics that we drew on the first round, it’s less than 60 percent of those players that are starting. I think it may have come in at 56 percent. So point being it’s not an exact science, we know that."
Before that there was a 2014 SB Nation post that calculated the first 3 rounds of 5 drafts (from 2010 thru 2014) and said that the league average of starters was 61%.
This is my first year as a dynasty owner. And in a few months I will be having my first rookie dynasty draft. I have no idea how to approach it? Really.

I say that because a typical QB may take years to develop. Though you wouldn't get the impression by looking at Dak Prescott's 2016 season. But there are plenty of other QB who are up and down (mostly down) for a newbie. So to me, drafting a QB is somewhat of a risk. Unless you want to see a player sit idle on your roster for a full season or more.
Then there are RB. Sure Ezekiel Elliott may have tore it up this year. But as fantasy owners, we know this certainly doesn't apply to every RB drafted. In fact, here are ALL the RB drafted in 2016 after Elliott through round 5:
Player / Round
Derrick Henry 2 (45)
Kenyan Drake 3 (73)
C.J. Prosise 3 (90)
Tyler Ervin 4 (119)
Kenneth Dixon 4 (134)
Devontae Booker 4 (136)
Deandre Washington 5 (143)
Paul Perkins 5 (149)
Jordan Howard 5 (150)
Wendell Smallwood 5 (153)
Jonathan Williams 5 (156)
Alex Collins 5 (171)
Derrick Henry 2 (45)
Kenyan Drake 3 (73)
C.J. Prosise 3 (90)
Tyler Ervin 4 (119)
Kenneth Dixon 4 (134)
Devontae Booker 4 (136)
Deandre Washington 5 (143)
Paul Perkins 5 (149)
Jordan Howard 5 (150)
Wendell Smallwood 5 (153)
Jonathan Williams 5 (156)
Alex Collins 5 (171)
As you can see, the potential may be there, but arguably, of this group Jordan Howard is the only one paying weekly dividends to fantasy owners at this point. The rest are still wait-and-see. I don't like those odds.
And let's not forget that the shelf-life of RB is short. Unless they are a stud. According to Statista, the average career of an NFL RB is 2.57 years. That's the shortest of all NFL careers. Which also means that if you draft a rookie RB and he fails to start or become the starter by the end of the season, chances are, he will be yet another sporadic or idle player taking up valuable space on your roster.
Which brings us to WR. (Yes, I'm purposely ignoring the TE position.) In the pass-happy NFL, they seem to be the player to draft. But not if you look at the mostly-pathetic group of WR drafted in 2016:
Player / Round
Corey Coleman 1 (15)
Will Fuller 1 (21)
Josh Doctson 1 (22)
Laquon Treadwell 1 (23)
Sterling Shepard 2 (40)
Michael Thomas 2 (47)
Tyler Boyd 2 (55)
Braxton Miller 3 (85)
Leonte Carroo 3 (86)
Chris Moore 4 (107)
Malcolm Mitchell 4 (112)
Ricardo Louis 4 (114)
Pharoh Cooper 4 (117)
Demarcus Robinson 4 (126)
Seth Devalve 4 (138)
Tajae Sharpe 5 (140)
Jordan Payton 5 (154)
Trevor Davis 5 (163)
Tyreek Hill 5 (165)
Rashard Higgins 5 (172)
Corey Coleman 1 (15)
Will Fuller 1 (21)
Josh Doctson 1 (22)
Laquon Treadwell 1 (23)
Sterling Shepard 2 (40)
Michael Thomas 2 (47)
Tyler Boyd 2 (55)
Braxton Miller 3 (85)
Leonte Carroo 3 (86)
Chris Moore 4 (107)
Malcolm Mitchell 4 (112)
Ricardo Louis 4 (114)
Pharoh Cooper 4 (117)
Demarcus Robinson 4 (126)
Seth Devalve 4 (138)
Tajae Sharpe 5 (140)
Jordan Payton 5 (154)
Trevor Davis 5 (163)
Tyreek Hill 5 (165)
Rashard Higgins 5 (172)
Again... No idea.

Maybe I should just trade all of my picks for veterans?

Last edited: