- Thread starter
- #21
Holy shit. Frank Gore is still in the league? Keep gettin' dem checks brother!
Um. He's actually EARNING THEM. Unlike some athletes in the League.
Holy shit. Frank Gore is still in the league? Keep gettin' dem checks brother!
If someone is willing to pay you to put on pads on Sunday and you put on pads on Sunday, you earned that check.Um. He's actually EARNING THEM. Unlike some athletes in the League.
If someone is willing to pay you to put on pads on Sunday and you put on pads on Sunday, you earned that check.
Go get 'em old man!
Nothing.What's stopping them from drafting Sony Michel? Not trying to hate on Gore but the RB class is very impressive.
True, but even the Giants would still have Darkwa which ain't a nothing, just not a proper RB1. What team is just devoid of RB talent?Nothing.
No team rolls with one RB though. I doubt Gores ego would prevent him from being second fiddle.
Gallman did alright for them too. As a rookie.True, but even the Giants would still have Darkwa which ain't a nothing, just not a proper RB1.
Yeah. I just can't think of a team that is just so lacking in RB talent where turning to a Gore is appealing. He's going to have to wait a long while before he gets an offer I'd have to imagine.Gallman did alright for them too. As a rookie.
Unless there's something I don't know, Gore really wouldn't be replacing anyone there.
Could be.Yeah. I just can't think of a team that is just so lacking in RB talent where turning to a Gore is appealing. He's going to have to wait a long while before he gets an offer I'd have to imagine.
Well, I was referring to Frank Gore, but if someone will pay you for that, I will cheer you on too!I'm 46.
ok. i dont call last year really good by any stretch but okHe was really good on a bad Colts team with a horrible offensive line.
What's stopping them from drafting Sony Michel? Not trying to hate on Gore but the RB class is very impressive.
Yeah. I just can't think of a team that is just so lacking in RB talent where turning to a Gore is appealing. He's going to have to wait a long while before he gets an offer I'd have to imagine.
At RB, that's what you do if you can. Latavius and Cook for example. Peterson and Kamara as another. 2 gives you a better chance than 1.Outside of the Giants I am not sure that makes sense for anyone. Quite frankly, that’s generous.
Wouldn't say most any of them are devoid. Worse than the rest of the league sure, but devoid no. They'll get by, and do fine. I don't think the difference between bad, average, good, and great are very big as far as running ability goes.Green Bay, Seattle, Tampa, Washington, Detroit, Arizona after the injury. That's just off the top of my head. I'm sure there are a few more where Gore would have been the best RB option for them last year.
In terms of wins and losses a lack of RB entails... (minimal difference) that doesn't particularly matter. Who cares if you have Fournette if you have Ivory and Yeldon? How big is the difference in value? I'd say not much at all even if Fournette is pretty obviously the most skilled.Im still not sure where all this mythical RB talent is that some people in this thread are seeing. Every year lately there are about 5-8 teams where the RB position is by far their biggest weakness.
Maybe, but he'll have to wait, a long, long while in order o get said job.Gore is not a great RB by any stretch of the imagination. But he still should have a role in this league.
I actually agree with this. I would just contend the difference Gore would make is so minimal it's justifiable to just sit on cap space at that point.That said I'm not sure any team out there is going to be willing to pay Gore what he will want to come back and take another year of the beating. But there will once again be 5-8 teams out there that would have been better off if they would have had Gore on their roster.
3.7 yards per carry on that Colts team is really good.ok. i dont call last year really good by any stretch but ok
He can still play and the Colts aren't interested in bringing him back.