Ragingcroc
mcklSJDFIOj
Not this year.With those assets, you give it to your biggest player, Logan Thomas, who makes that play 7 times out of 10.
Not this year.With those assets, you give it to your biggest player, Logan Thomas, who makes that play 7 times out of 10.
At least he has the excuse that he's not played. Detrick Bonner fucking blows.
Because we're doing just well enough.Is it just me, or is it about time Beamer decides if he wants to take the team to the next level, or to be a nice guy.
I like the family atmosphere as much as the next guy, but it seems that we are due another shakeup on the coaching staff. Why don't we have an offensive line? Other teams have them, why can't we have one?
There were some breakdowns on defense, but I think Bud Foster has earned his keep a time or two. The offense doesn't get that luxury.
Is it just me, or is it about time Beamer decides if he wants to take the team to the next level, or to be a nice guy.
I like the family atmosphere as much as the next guy, but it seems that we are due another shakeup on the coaching staff. Why don't we have an offensive line? Other teams have them, why can't we have one?
There were some breakdowns on defense, but I think Bud Foster has earned his keep a time or two. The offense doesn't get that luxury.
The offensive line grades are out.....everyone got above an 85 for the game.
Because we're doing just well enough.
It's going to take a 5 or 6 win year for Beamer to even consider firing Steinspring or Newsome. I would be willing to take that at this point. But Beamer is close enough to the end of his career, that I don't think he's willing to burn any bridges among friends.
I was just thinking that this might be the year that forces Beamer to shake things up. Not the quasi-shakeup with Shane and Cornell but the real deal that gets rid of the fat. "Nice Guy" Newsome and our hopeless OC combo.
I really don't feel so bad after this game. I've come a long way from 2 years ago after the Stanford beatdown which was the maddest I've ever been I think. I look at it this way...if we have such a bad year (5-6) losses that Beamer makes changes, then it's a good year. If the O-line and team continue to perform this poorly for the rest of the year and Beamer DOESN'T fire people, then it's time to step back and not invest in the team so much. Because I'm not going to continue to have hope that trying the same thing over and over again with the same people is going to produce different results like Beamer does. There is no excuse for the O-line to look this bad. They are new but most of them have been in the program for 3-4 years already. There is either a problem with recognizing talent or developing it or both.
There is no excuse for the O-line to look this bad. They are new but most of them have been in the program for 3-4 years already. There is either a problem with recognizing talent or developing it or both.
In theory, I agree with all this, but lets be real. It's no secret to anyone that our OL play has been holding us back for a long time. It's also no secret where the problems lie when we have a top 10 defense and an offense ranked in the 100's. That hasn't made a difference in the past, so no reason to think it will now. Beamer isn't going to be the guy to make an OC or OL coaching change, and it's pretty much that simple
So, I was there and I have to be honest:
1. Our offense was horrendous
2. Our defense may have been worth.
3. Both lines got zero push.
4. We got totally out-coached. I called Pitts plays for them when I saw their alignment.
5. We lost for one major reason, the players and coaches appeared to mail this one in. Pitt came out of the tunnel on fire. We jogged out. We forgot that regardless of records the other team is a BCS conference team that is trying to win as well.
6. We were two big plays from losing 35-3. We got our asses kicked.
I agree. Shell looked good didn't he? He had holes to run through but still he did a lot with them