redseat
Well-Known Member
The ball was under is hands on the ground. It was NOT a catch.
Both hands had possession though. I think it was a catch and I do not think there was an angle to overturn it
The ball was under is hands on the ground. It was NOT a catch.
Bahaha...dumass downs it at the 1
That ball should be at the one for the bears.
I sure thought he touched it firstis he out of bounds?
He touched it and then went out of bounds after. The refs are retarded.is he out of bounds?
Certainly looked like he didI sure thought he touched it first
They really need to change that rule.. Let's step OB and touch ball to get at 40
I agree but its too close to be angry.He touched it and then went out of bounds after. The refs are retarded.