WDIS Week 10

[wildturkey]

Need a streaming D

Seattle (vs Tampa)
Arizona (vs Rams) (surprisingly not a bad fantasy D as they get turnovers and score TDs, also Stafford might not play and the Rams O has struggled)
Giants (vs Houston)
NO (vs Pitt)

 

[TKOSpikes]

Need a streaming D

Seattle (vs Tampa)
Arizona (vs Rams) (surprisingly not a bad fantasy D as they get turnovers and score TDs, also Stafford might not play and the Rams O has struggled)
Giants (vs Houston)
NO (vs Pitt)

Gimme Zona, but like the Giants too

 

[Schmoopy1000]

Need a streaming D

Seattle (vs Tampa)
Arizona (vs Rams) (surprisingly not a bad fantasy D as they get turnovers and score TDs, also Stafford might not play and the Rams O has struggled)
Giants (vs Houston)
NO (vs Pitt)

I'd say the Giants No doubt for me

then NO, Ari, Seattle

 

[molsaniceman]

goff vs chi
carr vs indy

 

[TKOSpikes]

goff vs chi
carr vs indy

Carr

 

[Schmoopy1000]

goff vs chi
carr vs indy

probably go Goff.
Carr has the easier defense but I would believe to be run heavy game with Jacobs
I guess it might depend on how your QBs are scored.

 

[wildturkey]

goff vs chi
carr vs indy

Goff

 

[BrockForBroglio]

I'd say the Giants No doubt for me

then NO, Ari, Seattle

With your answer, I need to ask, would you sit Cooks and play Schultz today because of the defensive match-up?

 

[Schmoopy1000]

With your answer, I need to ask, would you sit Cooks and play Schultz today because of the defensive match-up?

I am assuming you mean Brandin Cooks.
Generally speaking normally wouldnt go TE over WR, but the last two weeks Cooks played (sat out last week pouting) He had 4 receptions each for 119 yds (11 targets)
Last two weeks Schultz played with Dak back. 5 receptions & 6 receptions for 123 yards (12 targets)
So if you are thinking of trying it. I'd say go for it. Very similar with Schultz beating him both weeks individually.
GB is unraveling on defense. Giants are feeling their oats.

 

[BrockForBroglio]

I am assuming you mean Brandin Cooks.
Generally speaking normally wouldnt go TE over WR, but the last two weeks Cooks played (sat out last week pouting) He had 4 receptions each for 119 yds (11 targets)
Last two weeks Schultz played with Dak back. 5 receptions & 6 receptions for 123 yards (12 targets)
So if you are thinking of trying it. I'd say go for it. Very similar with Schultz beating him both weeks individually.
GB is unraveling on defense. Giants are feeling their oats.

That's what I am leaning towards. I do like the chance of the longer plays with Cooks, still got 20minutes to go.

 

[Schmoopy1000]

That's what I am leaning towards. I do like the chance of the longer plays with Cooks, still got 20minutes to go.

if one or the other gets a TD will be your difference maker most likely. So it might have to be a long pass for Cooks, since I think if they get inside the 5 they will go pierce.

 

[Schmoopy1000]

@BrockForBroglio well I hope you took the chance on the TE.
Dont know how Schultz will do but going into the 4th Cooks is 3/12yds

 

[BrockForBroglio]

@BrockForBroglio well I hope you took the chance on the TE.
Dont know how Schultz will do but going into the 4th Cooks is 3/12yds

Went with Cooks, Schultz out pointed him by 10....But I had Fields, JT, Pollard and Kelce....up 165-74, he has Gibson and Davonte Smith tomorrow.

Thinking of using Fields next week even though Lamar is back with their match uos.

 

[SmokingMonkey]

Thinking of using Fields next week even though Lamar is back with their match uos.

Me too