Red_Alert
^^ Privileged ^^
Not sure of your point.
Top 250: Huskers (5) Purdue (0)
Can you do the same thing with Marshall and Bowling Green?
walk ons on 2 deep - TEN for Huskers, THREE for Purdue
Average star ranking separated by .04
walk ons on 2 deep - TEN for Huskers, THREE for Purdue
Average star ranking separated by .04
Dude, we battled all the way to the very bitter end against 5 teams before Purdue that were better than Purdue, and beat the piss out of another team that was better than Purdue.
We just plain and simply went to Purdue and got our asses kicked because the majority of the guys realized they were on a 3-5 team.
I don't know if I plorst this rightDoes anyone else realize that Riley has coordinators and position coaches. His demeanor on the field has nothing to do with the players morale. Look at Snyder some time.
On that chart, walk ons are given a value of 5.0, so they are not gaining very much with a 1 or 2 star. They are on the low end of this description:Walk-ons are not given ratings. So every one or 2 star Purdue player gives them points over Nebraska walk-ons. Even though they may be equal players, they are not rated the same. Therefore those ratings are skewed.
You originally said the Huskers had 50 walk-ons starting anyway.
Nebraska high school talent is rated 19th compared to Indiana's 26th.
Overall state football rankings
- 5.4-5.0 Division I prospect; considered a mid-major prospect; deemed to have limited pro potential but definite Division I prospect; may be more of a role player
And I'm not arguing "OMG PURDUE HAS MORE TALENT THAN US!"...this sort of thing has value, but clearly does not tell the WHOLE story.
Hey guys who am I
"IM GONNA THROW STATS AT YOU AND ARGUE TO I'M BLUE IN THE FACE, BUT IF YOU POST STATS I WONT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE THEM AND PRETEND THAT THEY ARE DUMB JUST LIKE YOU ARE"