DragonfromTO
Well-Known Member
I really don't feel like splitting hairs on this....but,tell that to the many baseball writers & historians who darn near unanimously thinks he was.
Who are you reading that is saying this? It can't be unanimous, given that I've read plenty of people who have said otherwise. I'd actually guess that it's not even a 51% majority in favour of Traynor's offense.
Never finished in the top 10 in OBP despite the .320 career BA. Finished in the top 10 in SLG once (9th in 1923). The only thing he could have on Baker is the batting average, and even that is a different perspective from a value standpoint given that Baker hit just 13 raw points lower than Traynor while the league average was just .266, or 28 points lower than when Pie was playing.
I mean, we're talking about 2 players with very similar raw OPS (Baker slightly higher even) and one of them played in an era where the league OPS was almost 100 points higher than the other. And that's the one that gets your vote?
Last edited: