- Thread starter
- #21
we should blow the play dead as well . why give the guy false hope ?
No chance that maybe Callahan decided LONG wasnt ready to start and decided it served the team best to shift the rookie inside for now and give Moses who SHOULD have already been ahead of most rookies the RT spot.
Just has to be that Scherff was a mistake right??
And before you say well then why isnt Moses at RG then, his KNOW weakness is his height and a lack of ability to get low enough to play guard consistently.
Put the best five on the field regardless of position
Look dude this isn't coming from me. It was widely reported here that Scherff struggled at RT, Kerrigan owned him on one on one drills. The concerns we all had about his lack of foot quickness are apparent, at least for now. He has struggle with the edge rush.
The move was by all reports a move based on Scherff's play at RT and his ability to play RG. It had nothing to do with Long's play, there is not one single report of that being the issue. Moses is a tackle, he was never considered a guard. Scherff was projected as a guard who they were going to try at RT. It didn't work, again for now anyway. So the natural move, if you want to put the best 5 on the field as you say, is to go with this group in these spots.
I have no problem with this move, again I think Scherff will be an awesome guard. The argument we had all spring was can Scherff fill the biggest need on this team, RT, or will he be converted to guard. And again my position was he won't be quick enough to play tackle, thuse not filling that critical need, and 5 is too high to take a guard especially when that guard is not even a guard, he is a converted tackle.
taking a guard at a certain point is a myth and will always be one you take the best player and we did