MilkSpiller22
Gorilla
I suspect the circles you talk in (I don’t mean to go personal, I apologize if this seems that way), he is probably spit on because of the asterisk. You seem to use it as one of your first arguments, so I suspect your friends fall in that class as well.
The only “hate” I ever see about Clemens is the asterisk. But he tends to get the same caveat that Bonds gets (“He is a stud, but his numbers were aided”).
Ranking pitchers is naturally more difficult than ranking position players. The metrics are pretty limited. I look at ERA (and its derivatives), WHIP, IP, accolades and W-L (only at the career scale). And because the roll of pitchers has changed so dramatically over the generations, it is hard to compare Mathewson to Maddux. Two baseball geniuses can have completely opposite opinions of who is better between the two of them, and both would have completely, defendable opinions.
the asterisk definitely made him a villain... and what happens to villains as well, anything close will always be given to the better PERSON...
Clemens is the most decorated pitcher of al time, and all his wins were deserved.. with that said... if you take single seasons... Maddux, Randy Johnson, Pedro were all better... maybe that is the problem...
when the other greats of his generation all had that SPECIAL season or 2... and Clemens never did, what does that mean??
if all at their best was better than Clemens best... how much does it matter that Clemens just had more best seasons, especially if it was extended with drugs... and proven...