Retroram52
Moderator
We leave two stranded and this one is pretty much done.
Me three, and I was a bit ticked off that we didn't pick Okafor given the chance.starting to warm up to us picking Russell. and I wanted Okafor too...
We leave two stranded and this one is pretty much done.
No one said Nance was bad. Just not a first round pick. What did you think of Russell??
Spot on Shaqdaddy on both posts.
I would argue that we would have used Clarkson and rando. Have to wait and see. I would not put Upshaw in the Okafor category.If Upshaw makes the team then drafting Okafor would have been pointless. Can't find an undrafted PG as good as Russell.
What you have to understand is that just because some one sees it different then you, doesn't make them wrong. You need to accept that not everyone agrees with you. I have no problem with a difference of opinion. However, you seem to have trouble with that.It's quite simple. I don't get why so many fans are pissed off we drafted Russell over Okafor.
Yes, 20 years ago every team was looking to get a dominant big. They had to compete with guys like Shaq, Olajuwon, D.Robinson, Ewing, Mourning etc. Now the only ones who can actually make a difference in a game are Cousins and Gasol, maybe Dwight.
Fast forward to 2015 and the dominant teams in the West - Warriors, Clippers, Blazers, Rockets are all lead by guards.
How is getting a 15/10 center going to make any difference when Curry, Lillard and Harden are running the ball at 100mph and shooting from a distance?
I would argue that we would have used Clarkson and rando. Have to wait and see. I would not put Upshaw in the Okafor category.
I would argue that we would have used Clarkson and rando. Have to wait and see. I would not put Upshaw in the Okafor category.
What you have to understand is that just because some one sees it different then you, doesn't make them wrong. You need to accept that not everyone agrees with you. I have no problem with a difference of opinion. However, you seem to have trouble with that.
What you have to understand is that just because some one sees it different then you, doesn't make them wrong. You need to accept that not everyone agrees with you. I have no problem with a difference of opinion. However, you seem to have trouble with that.
He said that Upshaw has a lot of work to do. Plus he's in terrible shape. Maybe Mitch is downplaying him a bit knowing he's an unrestricted free agent, but ultimately wants to sign him.
Hibbert of course came after the draft so now you are right, we don't need Okafor.We don't need Okafor. The days of dominant big men are far behind us and it's more of a faced paced, guard-oriented game.
If we can get Hibbert to protect the rim for us and Black, Randle and Nance Jr can get the rebounds, we'll have the guards doing the scoring.
Hibbert of course came after the draft so now you are right, we don't need Okafor.
With that lets face it, if we could have acquired a big such as Jordan instead of Hibbert, we would have. So, I'm not so sure I can agree with your assessment in bold above.
Consider 7 of SI's top 10 players last year were bigs. Where guard play is vital, big play is dominant.
SI.com's Top 100 NBA players of 2015 - NBA - SI.com
I think what folks like me need to come to grips with is the fit of the team. I think we drafted need with the No. 2 (With the available talent in FA) rather than BPA.