me as a parent has every right to look into what is being taught to my children and when things are introduced period . any other view is wrong
I think we're talking about two sides to the same coin.Actually they make money because they bring in revenue.
I think we're talking about two sides to the same coin.
For instance, people pay a fortune to see pandas in a zoo. Few, if anyone would pay to see horses in a zoo. One brings in a lot more revenue than the other--b/c one is much rarer than the other.
I think you and I will have to disagree.I don’t think so. THere are as many athletes as there are teachers. It is easier to measure how good an athlete is compared to others.
I think we're talking about two sides to the same coin.
For instance, people pay a fortune to see pandas in a zoo. Few, if anyone would pay to see horses in a zoo. One brings in a lot more revenue than the other--b/c one is much rarer than the other.
It still is. I forgot that someone started a separate on this. If it's gonna keep rolling, probably better to do it there.Is this still athlete vs teacher, because this could go a whole nother direction without data to support it. Especially outside the U.S.
Sorry, this kinda just caught me by surprise. No offense taken by your opinion