The Washington Post nails deflate gate yet again...must read.

[Money]

I am not saying that at all... Just stating wikipedia in general.... It's not know for it's accuracy... But I'm not saying what you qouted isn't true... I honestly don't know much about her stance on Armstrong

Talk in circles much?

 

[redseat]

Another must read Washington Post article:

Why Im not angry at Lance Armstrong - The Washington Post

See Washington Post is much better...

 

[redseat]

Talk in circles much?

Dude, what are you smoking?

 

[Scooby-Doo]

Rock hanging on by a string..... Again.

He frantically scours the interned trying to find something to clear his hero's name. Well done Rock. At least this one wasn't CBS Boston like the majority of your worthless propaganda.

 

[Money]

Dude, what are you smoking?

"It's not known for it's accuracy...I'm not saying it isn't true...I know nothing about her stance on Armstrong"???

Dude...wtf are you even saying???

 

[PolarVortex]

From Sally Jenkins wiki page:

Her attitude to Joe Paterno contrasts with her ongoing defense of Lance Armstrong since the release of the USADA report which has seen Armstrong stripped of the 7 Tour de France titles that he won.[4] She responded to the demise of the American cyclist and subject of two of her books with a column entitled "Why I’m not angry at Lance Armstrong". A passage reads: "And I’m confused as to why using cortisone as an anti-inflammatory in a 2,000-mile race is cheating, and I wonder why putting your own blood back into your body is the crime of the century."[5] The books she wrote with Armstrong contain passionate doping denials which turned out to be lies in light of the USADA investigation.[4]

Sally Jenkins - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Why am I not surprised that a defender of Lance Armstrong is also a defender of Tom Brady. LMFAO!!!

"It wasn't Ray Lewis' fault that his body guards killed a guy who had tried to pick a fight with Ray just a few minutes earlier...at 2 in the morning....outside of a nightclub. And, clearly no one except the guy who got killed was in an intoxicated-rage....or illegally in possesion of a firearm. Really. It wasn't Ray's fault. How could you possibly think it was"

 

[PatsFan2003]

You see the same pattern here. Brady’s phone was unimportant – until it was important, because Goodell needed it to be, to rescue his prestige.

Key paragraph sums it up pretty well.

 

[PatsFan2003]

"It wasn't Ray Lewis' fault that his body guards killed a guy who had tried to pick a fight with Ray just a few minutes earlier...at 2 in the morning....outside of a nightclub. And, clearly no one except the guy who got killed was in an intoxicated-rage....or illegally in possesion of a firearm. Really. It wasn't Ray's fault. How could you possibly think it was"

It was the obstruction that was this issue...

 

[Money]

"It wasn't Ray Lewis' fault that his body guards killed a guy who had tried to pick a fight with Ray just a few minutes earlier...at 2 in the morning....outside of a nightclub. And, clearly no one except the guy who got killed was in an intoxicated-rage....or illegally in possesion of a firearm. Really. It wasn't Ray's fault. How could you possibly think it was"

It surprises me that so many people consider the Brady offense comparable to the Lewis offense (even many Pats' fans).

BTW...did the author in question here write a book/article defending Ray Lewis (like Brady and Armstrong)? Is that why Ray Lewis is relevant here?

 

[PolarVortex]

It surprises me that so many people consider the Brady offense comparable to the Lewis offense (even many Pats' fans).

"I DID NOT TAKE STEROIDS! (wags his pointy finger at the Seante committee)"

~ Raffy Palmiero

 

[PolarVortex]

It surprises me that so many people consider the Brady offense comparable to the Lewis offense (even many Pats' fans).

BTW...did the author in question here write a book/article defending Ray Lewis (like Brady and Armstrong)? Is that why Ray Lewis is relevant here?

You are missing the point, and if you believe that Ray Lewis is guilty then you are in a minority among the Raven fan base and the comment does not apply to you.

 

[Money]

"I DID NOT TAKE STEROIDS! (wags his pointy finger at the Seante committee)"

~ Raffy Palmiero

You can go on and on bringing up lying, cheating scumbags (from every sport). I don't get the point. They have all had their days of reckoning. This is Brady's turn.

 

[Money]

You are missing the point, and if you believe that Ray Lewis is guilty then you are in a minority among the Raven fan base and the comment does not apply to you.

Ray Lewis was guilty of cheating when he took deer antler spray and then he lied about it. I just don't get the deflection. What does that have to do with Brady's actions?

 

[Money]

You are missing the point, and if you believe that Ray Lewis is guilty then you are in a minority among the Raven fan base and the comment does not apply to you.

If your point is that anyone who has had a liar or cheater on their team now has to be okay with lying and cheating then:

A. That's pretty much everyone and

B. I couldn't disagree more

 

[DHoey]

Did anybody actually read that long, boring as fuck OP?

 

[Rock Strongo]

Hey Rock...thanks bringing up yet another parallel between Brady and Armstrong.

I didn't. You did...and cited open source content lol

 

[Rock Strongo]

Did anybody actually read that long, boring as fuck OP?

Smart people read.

Ps cotton...i.e vortex...is a Seattle fan and hates brady. We go back a ways.

 

[Rock Strongo]

Is this your way of calling everything in there about her defense of Lance Armstrong lies???

She didn't write a book titled "Why I'm Not Angry at Lance Armstrong"???

What does that have to do with john Dowd?

 

[Oldschool739]

"It's not known for it's accuracy...I'm not saying it isn't true...I know nothing about her stance on Armstrong"???

Dude...wtf are you even saying???

This is what he's saying;

 

[redseat]

"It's not known for it's accuracy...I'm not saying it isn't true...I know nothing about her stance on Armstrong"???

Dude...wtf are you even saying???

I'm saying.... Why quote a Wikipedia article? I hate that site, that's all I am saying.