- Thread starter
- #41
MHSL82
Well-Known Member
Can we subtract the Pittsburgh fans who voted for Rothelisburger and the Indy fans who voted for Luck too? Or do you only get to subtract Seahawk fan votes?
Just the Pittsburgh fans.

Can we subtract the Pittsburgh fans who voted for Rothelisburger and the Indy fans who voted for Luck too? Or do you only get to subtract Seahawk fan votes?
I picked Ryan as well. I think he's going to have a monster season, when you consider all the weapons he has, and the addition of Steven Jackson.
I dont get why Russell Wilson was selected here, there's just guys that are not on the list that can spin it better and make better decisions
I dont get why Russell Wilson was selected here, there's just guys that are not on the list that can spin it better and make better decisions
Try watching him play a little more and you would figure it out.
In all of the 38 years I have watched the Seahawks, we have never had a QB can handle the pressure, who can calmly make the right decision when under great duress.
Behind one of the worst pass blocking OLs in the league last year and a WR corp that did not have a #1 WR he made great decisions and posted great numbers. He rarely threw INTs, he made big plays when he needed to.
With the way the Seahawks are built and their emphasis on the running game and strong D he will not put up 4500+ yard seasons (but that could change in the future) but he will do what is necessary and he will do what is correct.
He's not a bad QB, I have watched him play and i've been impressed...but Top 5 is a huge stretch
He makes plays because he can extend the plays, ...The Seattle O-line was not awful by any mean, alot of the sacks that gave up were b/c Russell was trying to make a play.
He's had 19 picks and 11 fumbles in his 2 year career, he can turn it over.
Seattle has a great formula goin for them and if Russell played for the Raiders, we may not of known him that well
That's just completely wrong.
Nobody will deny that Wilson holds on to the ball and extends plays. But that doesn't mean that his offensive line wasn't atrocious. He was sacked plenty of times because the interior was demolished at the snap.
lol, just throw your oline under the bus.....get familiar with other olines around the league, u might appreciate those guys a little more
Maybe you just need to get familiar with the line that you're talking about.
This is just a great example of someone talking out of their ass. An oline is something that you need to watch week in, week out to give a real valuation. You dont watch nearly enough of the Seahawks oline to draw any kind of real conclusión. Anyone that does watch them extensively came to the same conclusion, they started average but as injuries mounted they sucked. I dont come on this board talking about the falcons line. I watched the team a few times but if I pretended like thats nearly enough to tell you who they are, I would look like a jerkoff. That obviously doesnt stop everyone though.
You're right, with such compelling thought as...
"They were atrocious" and "the middle would get blown up"
As a fair weather fan, I knew I was outmatched by such a well worded analysis
You're right, with such compelling thought as...
"They were atrocious" and "the middle would get blown up"
As a fair weather fan, I knew I was outmatched by such a well worded analysis
This is where you both are out of line, I never said they were good
I'm arguing that they weren't atrocious like the hawk fans are making them out to be and Russell Wilson is this god like qb that had no help whatsoever
This is where you both are out of line, I never said they were good
I'm arguing that they weren't atrocious like the hawk fans are making them out to be and Russell Wilson is this god like qb that had no help whatsoever
This is where you both are out of line, I never said they were good
I'm arguing that they weren't atrocious like the hawk fans are making them out to be and Russell Wilson is this god like qb that had no help whatsoever