Ties5o11
Active Member
I agree with Jeff, I think the hit was alright. This is the freaking NHL playoffs, if he stuck and elbow out or something, I get it, but come on, he just hit the guy who was ducking his head for whatever reason.
I agree with Jeff, I think the hit was alright. This is the freaking NHL playoffs, if he stuck and elbow out or something, I get it, but come on, he just hit the guy who was ducking his head for whatever reason.
Shoulder or elbow, what's the difference? Rule 48 was implemented to clear up any confusion about a targeted hit to the head, a la the hit that Cooke delivered to Savard, which was a shoulder to the head.
Malone was fortunate that he didn't get a clean shot directly to Pascal's head, but IMO that was his target.
Now your using interpretation. That would completely destroy the NHL. If you allow refs to assume what a plays intentions were, goodbye NHL, I would pay more attention to the FHL. He did not hit his head with his elbow, his shoulder or his jockstrap. That is the answer, not what his intentions were. Unless he comes out and says "I was aiming for his head", then nobody knows.
The outcome on the ice, that is what you go by. Not the result, but the action.
I'm not convinced Malone didn't connect with Pascal's head. I think he got a little of both the back of his head, and the top of his shoulder. Look where Dupuis helmet is after the hit, its on his head like he's wearing a Amish hat!
As to your point about the NHL interpreting a players' action... that has already begun, IMO.
Look how a players previous infractions weigh in on a current one. They use a players track record to determine future penalties. If that isn't interpreting a players actions, I don't know what is?!
I agree with using a players track record as judging the severity of his consequences. But to penalize a player for thinking he was going to do something or trying to do something that didn't happen, thats a joke. I have to see the replay again, I just remember when I saw it I was sold there was no head contact.
Malone's hit wasn't a head shot, but it was blind side and incredibly stupid. He was targeting him and came from the other side of the ice to hit a vulnerable player. Because of that I think there's a minor possibility of penalty, but highly doubt it. It was incredibly stupid of him though...there were 4 TB players back on the lone Penguin on the PK and he came from no where to try and take him out. Still, not a head shot...I've only seen it once though (live).
I wanted to find this thread and post it. If Kunitz gets one, I don't see how Malone gets any. However this is the NHL so who the fuck knows. How about Richards too. Can someone post the videos?