THE PAC12 THREAD v.4

[WizardHawk]

Jesus, for someone that basically lives for trolling others you sure are a sensitive little fella.

 

[TheDayMan]

Jesus, for someone that basically lives for trolling others you sure are a sensitive little fella.

He's something else, that one...

 

[Vitamike]

Anyways.....

 

[Vitamike]

Anyone have a clue as to who's gonna win the South?

Any of yous ready to say that The Cardinal is a lock for the North just yet?
(Besides SUBuddha)

 

[WizardHawk]

South is still up for grabs. Depends on who's hot down the stretch.
I said Stanford from the north, and overall conf champ from day 1 and that's still what I'm sticking to.

 

[Vitamike]

South is still up for grabs. Depends on who's hot down the stretch.
I said Stanford from the north, and overall conf champ from day 1 and that's still what I'm sticking to.

I was there with you on the Stanford call, had some huge doubts early after their opener.

 

[TheDayMan]

Anyone have a clue as to who's gonna win the South?

Any of yous ready to say that The Cardinal is a lock for the North just yet?
(Besides SUBuddha)

1) No one really cares about the south.

2) if I had to put money down, it'd be on stanford...

 

[TheDayMan]

On his show yesterday, softy said WSU beating Stanford is a lock...

Softy is a stupid dumbass though...

 

[WizardHawk]

I was there with you on the Stanford call, had some huge doubts early after their opener.

Utah probably has the easier schedule between you and them going down to the wire, but USC has some of their easier games as well. Both zona schools have more meat on their plate than either Utah or USC. If I had to bet I'd probably still give a slight edge to Utah, but I haven't liked them all year for some reason.

 

[The Derski]

I'm here!

 

[Olyduck]

Anyone have a clue as to who's gonna win the South?

Any of yous ready to say that The Cardinal is a lock for the North just yet?
(Besides SUBuddha)

didnt you see my post from yesterday?

 

[Vitamike]

didnt you see my post from yesterday?

I did, and it was not an opinion rather just the facts, right?

I like that you do that, but it's only about the paths, not the journey.

 

[Olyduck]

I did, and it was not an opinion rather just the facts, right?

I like that you do that, but it's only about the paths, not the journey.

I also feel like there are other what ifs that could come into play. like what if Oregon wins out which inludes a win over Stanford to finish 7-2 in conference, Stanford loses to Oregon and Colorado (long shot I know) to also be 7-2, WSU loses to Stanford but win all others to be 7-2. but then we have to get into the whole tie break stuff because we would have the 3 way tie where each beat eachother.

 

[Vitamike]

I also feel like there are other what ifs that could come into play. like what if Oregon wins out which inludes a win over Stanford to finish 7-2 in conference, Stanford loses to Oregon and Colorado (long shot I know) to also be 7-2, WSU loses to Stanford but win all others to be 7-2. but then we have to get into the whole tie break stuff because we would have the 3 way tie where each beat eachother.

Multiple-team ties If three or more teams are tied atop a division at the end of the season, the following criteria are used to eliminate teams until just two teams remain, at which point the two-team tiebreaking procedure is used.

1. Head-to-head results (best record in games between tied teams)
2. Record in intra-divisional games
3. Record against the next highest placed team in the divison (based on the record in all conference games), proceeding through the division
4. Record in common conference games
5. Highest ranking in College Football Playoff poll entering the final weekend of the regular season

Pac-12 Football Championship Game tiebreaker explanation

So in your scenario Oly, throw out No. 1 and move to intra-division games.

 

[Olyduck]

So in your scenario Oly, throw out No. 1 and move to intra-division games.

itra division would have WSU out then because they lost to Cal and Stanford while Oregons losses were a N and a S team. If Stan lost to Oregon and Colorado keeps them in while if they lost to Oregon and Cal Oregon wins the division. did I do that right?

 

[Olyduck]

If then it came to #3 then Stanford wins because record against next highest placed team in the division would be WSU who would be tied up with the others but beat Oregon

 

[The Derski]

ASU is wearing these on Thursday

 

[Vitamike]

itra division would have WSU out then because they lost to Cal and Stanford while Oregons losses were a N and a S team. If Stan lost to Oregon and Colorado keeps them in while if they lost to Oregon and Cal Oregon wins the division. did I do that right?

Sounds right to me.

 

[JonBlaze]

It never felt in question though.

I can see that. There was definitely a talent difference. I never felt "in it" after half time. Freeman was too much of a man child for the Buffs.

 

[WizardHawk]

Still can't get over that after all this time we have a real life buffs fan up here.

Now we need more than just a couple of people who also root for Cal and get a real Cal fan in here and our dinner set would be complete.