The PAC12 THREAD v.2

[socaljim242]

not a shock considering so much of your vitriolic filled rant was rendered moot with those pesky facts I spoke of. I Would have predicted this would be roughly the time you would quit. I mean you kind of have to in order to try to appear disinterested. Your tirade betrays it, but it is still expected.

You may have decided to let it go for now, but we both know this isn't the end. You now have more time to work on your material to do better the next time you are easily goaded into a Sark discussion.

F ing hilarious. facts huh?
UW - seahawk fan- Sarks teams were undisciplined. Sark learned under Pete who now coaches your Seahawks.
who were the most penalized team in the NFL. I bet you didn't complain about those undiceplined players did you.
Rick Neuheisel could win there- He had one UNO good year. But the other three ?7-5, 8-4, 7-6
and he got tossed when numerous players got arrested and he was found talking to NFL teams without informing UW. But Sark "bailed" on UW huh.lol
Funny how you only remember the good stuff about Rick when putting down Sark.

 

[WhiteMamba]

 

[socaljim242]

Another thing. Rich took over UW on his fifth year being a head coach and took over a 6-6 team. UW was Sarks first head coaching gig and took over a pathetic 0-9 team. Some how these "facts" have to be viewed when looking at their coaching tenure at Udub.

 

[WizardHawk]

Nope not at all. Your post shows just how rustled your jimmies are. What's truly funny is that everyone see's it except you.

As for it not ending. As I've already told you:

Ah yes, the old no, really you are the one who is angry and everyone knows it but you.

Let's see here. You keep saying you aren't rustled and yet 4 pages later here you still are vociferously defending your HC. You say you aren't rustled and yet you are the only one making it personal and flat out making stuff up to cover up for lack of evidence to support the unsupportable. But I'm the one everyone sees as angry.

No my friend, what everyone does see here though is just how easily you are pushed into discussions about Sark. Easiest troll on this board these days. Still quite enjoyable though and I look forward to the next one.

 

[trojanfan12]

Ah yes, the old no, really you are the one who is angry and everyone knows it but you.

Let's see here. You keep saying you aren't rustled and yet 4 pages later here you still are vociferously defending your HC. You say you aren't rustled and yet you are the only one making it personal and flat out making stuff up to cover up for lack of evidence to support the unsupportable. But I'm the one everyone sees as angry.

No my friend, what everyone does see here though is just how easily you are pushed into discussions about Sark. Easiest troll on this board these days. Still quite enjoyable though and I look forward to the next one.

 

[4down20]

I'll take a guess he is a Stanford fan because they beat Oregon and he doesn't have to fear his Tide getting smashed by the Ducks in NCG.

If you can't handle Stanford, you really wouldn't be able to handle Alabama.

I am a fan of Stanford for a few reasons.

1. They are the "smart kids" and I think that is pretty damn cool. I think the school itself is pretty awesome.
2. I spent the past decade in the Bay Area, so they were a local team.
3. I love their style of football, and I like watching them play. I've seen the Stanford vs Oregon game probably over 20 times because the Pac12 network would play it over and over.
4. Even though they call it Cardinal Red, it's the exact same color as Alabama.
5. Unique Mascot that isn't even actually a mascot.

To me, Stanford is like an Alabama of the west.

 

[WizardHawk]

F ing hilarious. facts huh?
UW - seahawk fan- Sarks teams were undisciplined. Sark learned under Pete who now coaches your Seahawks.
who were the most penalized team in the NFL. I bet you didn't complain about those undiceplined players did you.
Rick Neuheisel could win there- He had one UNO good year. But the other three ?7-5, 8-4, 7-6
and he got tossed when numerous players got arrested and he was found talking to NFL teams without informing UW. But Sark "bailed" on UW huh.lol
Funny how you only remember the good stuff about Rick when putting down Sark.

Another thing. Rich took over UW on his fifth year being a head coach and took over a 6-6 team. UW was Sarks first head coaching gig and took over a pathetic 0-9 team. Some how these "facts" have to be viewed when looking at their coaching tenure at Udub.

The reason I didn't respond to you the first time is I think it was obvious how weak your argument was so it didn't need a reply.

First of all the Seahawks do play a style that creates a lot of penalties and I have said I wish they wouldn't have so many, but THEY WIN with that style. Sark? Lost countless games due to those penalties AND it wasn't because they play a very aggressive style of defense. No, they were personal penalties, false starts, too many men on the field, etc. The Seahawks get a lot of penalties because of playing aggressive. I'll trust that those who aren't trying to create something out of nothing will easily be able to tell the difference.

As for RN, you really aren't helping your cause with your arguments. Ricky sweater-vest came into a team that was on the decline and finished 6-6 the prior year, to back to going to a decent bowl the first year he came in (with other guys kids) and in his second season took them to the RB. You know, on that team that can't win with Sark at the helm in 5 full years because they are perennial middle of the road at best teams. You just aren't helping your cause here bro. If RN can win at UW in year 2 with other guys kids and take the conference on his way to an 11-1 season with a RB win then 7 sark should be able to at least win more than 7 games in 5 years with nothing but his own kids, his own staff, and his own schemes over that span. And anyone with reasonable objectivity would agree with that.

No one has said Sark sucks. Well at least I haven't said that. And I've already told TF12 dozens of times that no one knows what Sark's ceiling is. Maybe he keeps growing, maybe not. What we do know is he did bring UW back from the dead and he was thanked for that. He didn't go past that however and no one argues with that. This notion that he did all he could because of where he coached is laughable given history. We are told he brought them back to the 8.5 wins a year they deserve, but he never got above that, more or less averaged it. It is a fact that his teams were last in the conference in penalties. Sorry, but facts are facts. Blame it on who you want, but it all falls on his head. It was his kids with his coaches taught his way. Period.

And the rest of you doubt what is coming when UW and USC actually play again? I'm sure this is going to be hashed out over and over until that games comes. I mean we know TF12 won't resist that bait and it appears others are easily brought along with him.

 

[trojanfan12]

If you can't handle Stanford, you really wouldn't be able to handle Alabama.

I am a fan of Stanford for a few reasons.

1. They are the "smart kids" and I think that is pretty damn cool. I think the school itself is pretty awesome.
2. I spent the past decade in the Bay Area, so they were a local team.
3. I love their style of football, and I like watching them play. I've seen the Stanford vs Oregon game probably over 20 times because the Pac12 network would play it over and over.
4. Even though they call it Cardinal Red, it's the exact same color as Alabama.
5. Unique Mascot that isn't even actually a mascot.

To me, Stanford is like an Alabama of the west.

Their band is pretty damn cool too. I think they are the only band that has actually been banned from a few schools stadiums.

 

[4down20]

Their band is pretty damn cool too. I think they are the only band that has actually been banned from a few schools stadiums.

Yep, I always got a kick out of that.

 

[Not Neutral]

Everyone was getting along pretty well until OD showed up from nowhere, then the truth hit the fan.
First time in ages I couldn't read the days posts in five minutes. THANKS, OD and keep rustling.

 

[WizardHawk]

Everyone was getting along pretty well until OD showed up from nowhere, then the truth hit the fan.
First time in ages I couldn't read the days posts in five minutes. THANKS, OD and keep rustling.

Actually it started with TF12 and I taunting 4d20 and then going after each other when his comebacks weren't cutting it. OD just happened along at the right/wrong time.

 

[Wild Turkey]

If you can't handle Stanford, you really wouldn't be able to handle Alabama.

I am a fan of Stanford for a few reasons.

1. They are the "smart kids" and I think that is pretty damn cool. I think the school itself is pretty awesome.
2. I spent the past decade in the Bay Area, so they were a local team.
3. I love their style of football, and I like watching them play. I've seen the Stanford vs Oregon game probably over 20 times because the Pac12 network would play it over and over.
4. Even though they call it Cardinal Red, it's the exact same color as Alabama.
5. Unique Mascot that isn't even actually a mascot.

To me, Stanford is like an Alabama of the west.

Interesting theory I guess if you:

1. Remove academic standards.
2. Red neck bandwagon fan base.
3. Cult like coach worshipping.
4. Addiction to outdated plaid like patterns.
5. Dirty recruiting tactics.
6. Unsavory memorabilia stores.
7. Criminal fan acts.

You might be onto something.

 

[RegentDenali]

Well alrighty then..........

Alabama expected to hire former UW assistant Tosh Lupoi

Alabama is expected to hire Tosh Lupoi – the center of an NCAA recruiting probe while at Washington – as a football staff member, according to sources.

Lupoi visited Alabama's football campus recently and could wind up in the team's personnel department, though his exact position is still unclear. He won't be a position coach.

Lupoi was an assistant at Cal and Washington for six seasons and was reportedly set to join Steve Sarkisian at USC before a Los Angeles Times report surfaced that Lupoi allegedly paid $4,500 for a recruit's tutoring through a local high school track coach.

Lupoi denied the allegations and, after a six-week NCAA investigation, was absolved of wrongdoing. In a February interview with CBSSports.com's Bruce Feldman, Lupoi said he's "excited to take the next step in life."

Washington paid Lupoi a $300,000 mutual separation buyout. Lupoi was considered a high-level recruiter while a defensive line coach in the Pac-12.

 

[4down20]

Interesting theory I guess if you:

1. Remove academic standards.
2. Red neck bandwagon fan base.
3. Cult like coach worshipping.
4. Addiction to outdated plaid like patterns.
5. Dirty recruiting tactics.
6. Unsavory memorabilia stores.
7. Criminal fan acts.

You might be onto something.

You forgot a petty little brother school who's jealous fans follow you around and constantly try to find any moment to make themselves appear better at your expense.

 

[Wild Turkey]

You forgot a petty little brother school who's jealous fans follow you around and constantly try to find any moment to make themselves appear better at your expense.

Got news for you I don't follow you anywhere I posted on page 1 on the PAC Thread over on CBS and was a regular on the BIG "The Thread" which inspired it. I gots "street cred" my man.

As for jealous that will be the day I was an Auburn fan in the 70's man as far as I'm concerned we are on top of the world!

Even you have to admit it isn't that hard to make yourself appear "better" when looking at the headlines your fan base makes. I just couldn't let you insult Stanford like that and had to take up for my PAC friends we used to have some great Stanford posters over at CBS and I someone has to pick the torch up for them from time to time.

 

[mcnabb7542]

In other news:

five white guys playing basketball for the University of Whisky made a pack to demolish the Pac 12 basketball teams this year in the big dance......

 

[4down20]

Got news for you I don't follow you anywhere I posted on page 1 on the PAC Thread over on CBS and was a regular on the BIG "The Thread" which inspired it. I gots "street cred" my man.

As for jealous that will be the day I was an Auburn fan in the 70's man as far as I'm concerned we are on top of the world!

Even you have to admit it isn't that hard to make yourself appear "better" when looking at the headlines your fan base makes. I just couldn't let you insult Stanford like that and had to take up for my PAC friends we used to have some great Stanford posters over at CBS and I someone has to pick the torch up for them from time to time.

I didn't teabag anyone or poison any trees, nor am I ignorant enough to think that the actions of a few define an entire fanbase. Should I claim that all Auburn fans get kittens off Craigslist so they can torture and kill them?

Auburn fans smash kittens they buy on craigslist | TMB

Or maybe I'll use a little common sense and think - hmm, probably just the 1 asshole and is an individual thing and not something that actually represents the entire Auburn fan base.

As for Stanford - I gave the reasons why I like them. It's called an opinion and I don't care if you like my reasons for it or not. Then you took your petty ass in here and decided to apply the actions of a few fans on them so that you could then defend Stanford on it? Get bent.

 

[socaljim242]

The reason I didn't respond to you the first time is I think it was obvious how weak your argument was so it didn't need a reply.

First of all the Seahawks do play a style that creates a lot of penalties and I have said I wish they wouldn't have so many, but THEY WIN with that style. Sark? Lost countless games due to those penalties AND it wasn't because they play a very aggressive style of defense. No, they were personal penalties, false starts, too many men on the field, etc. The Seahawks get a lot of penalties because of playing aggressive. I'll trust that those who aren't trying to create something out of nothing will easily be able to tell the difference.

As for RN, you really aren't helping your cause with your arguments. Ricky sweater-vest came into a team that was on the decline and finished 6-6 the prior year, to back to going to a decent bowl the first year he came in (with other guys kids) and in his second season took them to the RB. You know, on that team that can't win with Sark at the helm in 5 full years because they are perennial middle of the road at best teams. You just aren't helping your cause here bro. If RN can win at UW in year 2 with other guys kids and take the conference on his way to an 11-1 season with a RB win then 7 sark should be able to at least win more than 7 games in 5 years with nothing but his own kids, his own staff, and his own schemes over that span. And anyone with reasonable objectivity would agree with that.

No one has said Sark sucks. Well at least I haven't said that. And I've already told TF12 dozens of times that no one knows what Sark's ceiling is. Maybe he keeps growing, maybe not. What we do know is he did bring UW back from the dead and he was thanked for that. He didn't go past that however and no one argues with that. This notion that he did all he could because of where he coached is laughable given history. We are told he brought them back to the 8.5 wins a year they deserve, but he never got above that, more or less averaged it. It is a fact that his teams were last in the conference in penalties. Sorry, but facts are facts. Blame it on who you want, but it all falls on his head. It was his kids with his coaches taught his way. Period.

And the rest of you doubt what is coming when UW and USC actually play again? I'm sure this is going to be hashed out over and over until that games comes. I mean we know TF12 won't resist that bait and it appears others are easily brought along with him.

So you tell us about the good ol days when Rick N was there how even he could win there and complaining about the "undisciplined" teams under Sark when Rick was pretty much fired because his players were outta control not only on the field but off and he never got over the hump with his players? Nice.lol . Gotta love UW fan for thinking a Rose Bowl win is followed by mediocre seasons is somehow something to brag about.

 

[trojanfan12]

Actually it started with TF12 and I taunting 4d20 and then going after each other when his comebacks weren't cutting it. OD just happened along at the right/wrong time.

Truth!! 4d20 needs to step his game up!!

 

[Wild Turkey]

I didn't teabag anyone or poison any trees, nor am I ignorant enough to think that the actions of a few define an entire fanbase. Should I claim that all Auburn fans get kittens off Craigslist so they can torture and kill them?

Auburn fans smash kittens they buy on craigslist | TMB

Or maybe I'll use a little common sense and think - hmm, probably just the 1 asshole and is an individual thing and not something that actually represents the entire Auburn fan base.

As for Stanford - I gave the reasons why I like them. It's called an opinion and I don't care if you like my reasons for it or not. Then you took your petty ass in here and decided to apply the actions of a few fans on them so that you could then defend Stanford on it? Get bent.

LMAO!

Tell you want why don't you just start trying to sell us as "Kitty Killers" and I'll stick with Tree Poisoners and Teabaggers for you.

I have a feeling what will stick and what will make you look like a complete idiot but nice try at a deflection!