THE PAC 12 THREAD v.5

[OregonDucks]

There was no definitive view of that. You don't see the football until his backside is down, but that's not proof of when it was dislodged.

That wasn't the only questionable call, but the point is still the same. When you lose 5 turnovers at home you can't blame the refs or anyone else for a loss. It's that simple.

Sure you are right about the other turnovers, but nonetheless, I think there was video evidence that showed he was down before the ball came out. Even the announcers thought so.

 

[WizardHawk]

Arizona did get a defensive stop the following drive and had a chance to still win one more time, but threw an INT. But I felt like on the INT throw there was a late hit on the QB that wasn't called.

Are you serious? It wasn't a late hit at all, and it wasn't targeting like they were looking into.

You are really stretching to find reasons to suggest Utah didn't earn that win.

Take care of the football on offense.

 

[trojanfan12]

When you lose 5 turnovers at home you can't blame the refs or anyone else for a loss. It's that simple.

Fact

 

[OregonDucks]

Are you serious? It wasn't a late hit at all, and it wasn't targeting like they were looking into.

You are really stretching to find reasons to suggest Utah didn't earn that win.

Take care of the football on offense.

I don't like Rich Rod in the least bit, and I even think they got hosed in that game. I thought it was a late hit. Not targeting like they were looking into, but the hit was pretty late for football these days. I have seen them call a late hit penalty on hits that were earlier then that.

 

[WizardHawk]

I don't like Rich Rod in the least bit, and I even think they got hosed in that game. I thought it was a late hit. Not targeting like they were looking into, but the hit was pretty late for football these days. I have seen them call a late hit penalty on hits that were earlier then that.

The announcers even said the INT was because he was about to get hit. It was legit.

 

[OregonDucks]

The announcers even said the INT was because he was about to get hit. It was legit.

If that is Tom Brady its a flag.

Regardless that drive should have never happened because he didn't fumble the drive before.

 

[WizardHawk]

If that is Tom Brady its a flag.

Regardless that drive should have never happened because he didn't fumble the drive before.

You would have to have a camera view that actually sees the football at the moment he hits the ground. There wasn't. The ball is seen moving away from him after he hits the ground, but we cannot see that moment it came loose. You are creating things that do not exist if you do not agree with that.

In any event, you are again trying to use the refs to excuse 5 turnovers. You don't like one of them? Sure, so they had 4 turnovers at home against a ranked team. You aren't going to win many of those.

 

[OregonDucks]

You would have to have a camera view that actually sees the football at the moment he hits the ground. There wasn't. The ball is seen moving away from him after he hits the ground, but we cannot see that moment it came loose. You are creating things that do not exist if you do not agree with that.

In any event, you are again trying to use the refs to excuse 5 turnovers. You don't like one of them? Sure, so they had 4 turnovers at home against a ranked team. You aren't going to win many of those.

Are you disagreeing with me to just disagree with me? The review showed his back hit the ground first then the ball came out. The announcers even pointed it out. Dude was down. Yes tough to win when you have 5 turnovers, but 4 turnovers and Arizona could have won that game.

 

[WizardHawk]

Are you disagreeing with me to just disagree with me? The review showed his back hit the ground first then the ball came out. The announcers even pointed it out. Dude was down. Yes tough to win when you have 5 turnovers, but 4 turnovers and Arizona could have won that game.

Show video proof. You can't.

 

[OregonDucks]

Show video proof. You can't.

Has the game been uploaded to YouTube yet? Because I will gladly show it as it was broadcasted on FS1 and everyone who was watching the game saw it.

 

[WizardHawk]

Has the game been uploaded to YouTube yet? Because I will gladly show it as it was broadcasted on FS1 and everyone who was watching the game saw it.

Yes, we did all watch it. We were in the game thread talking about it while it was happening. What you think you saw you didn't see. It's that simple. The player defending it blocked the view of the moment the ball was dislodged. That's a pure fact.

 

[socaljim242]

As a college football fan I reserve the right to bitch about bad calls especially at the end of the game but yeah , usually most teams have only themselves to blame for losses. If USC had a terrible call go against them at the end of the game against Texas I would have bitched but in reality the receivers droping like six catchable balls was their main problem. Catch them and the game isn't close. Texas might wanna cover Deontay Burnett. If they make others make plays instead of him they might have won.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

San Diego St. >>> all PAC teams

last time whizzconsin came to corvallis they got their nuts kicked in….


pac > big10



babbaahhahahahahah.

 

[WizardHawk]

No view of the fumble, but it does show the last pick you think there was a late hit on at the very end. It shows it several times so watch to the end of that sequence.

There is no way that is a late hit. Period.

 

[WizardHawk]

40 some seconds in

Of course the homer sports guy thinks he sees the video showing he was down, but it doesn't.

Would I have called that a fumble at the time? No, but since it was called you must have clear video evidence to overturn it and that clarity isn't there. It just isn't.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

i feel great today knowing GA won't lose (get blown out again) this weekend, next up a home date w/ the Warshington Mossbacks @ home @ 5pm.

i'll be thar!

 

[WizardHawk]

National ABC afternoon game of the week and no one makes a GDT for the SC/Cal game?

 

[Great Dayne]

last time whizzconsin came to corvallis they got their nuts kicked in….


pac > big10



babbaahhahahahahah.

Last time they played the best team in the PAC a couple years ago in a bowl game the Badgers won as the underdog.

Yawn, next please

 

[WizardHawk]

So, anything interesting happen in the Pac today?

Any upsets or anything? Manifestos maybe? Planes departing to meet up with Chip or something?

 

[socaljim242]

Wait hold on - I thought Oregon was going to fall back to the bottom of the conference?????