You have to just ignore wazzy. The rest of us do when he goes into full blown stupid mode. Little brother syndrome en sech.
You, @SUBuddha and @trojanfan12, all shit listed.And still only half a championship less, right big bro
Wazzy is a coug, life already shit listed him.You, @SUBuddha and @trojanfan12, all shit listed.
What the fuck did I do?You, @SUBuddha and @trojanfan12, all shit listed.
What the fuck did I do?
No, it's because dayman must know my rating was a self deprecating one. Them Bruins only can claim a share a Single National Title themselves.Probably the same thing I did. Rated wazzy's post funny.
So did @Vitamike but he wasn't named. Probably because he's a Bruin and already shit listed by everyone.
and one LA school, I wont mention any names,
No, it's because dayman must know my rating was a self deprecating one. Them Bruins only can claim a share a Single National Title themselves.
of
The Ironic thing is every other school that has a unified NT, claims every share they have as a whole too, and one LA school, I wont mention any names, claims a shared NT as a whole when they agreed they would only recognize the BCS Title that year as the only NT winner.
You better recognize.
Not that one anyway. I'll recognize them LSU Tigers as Pete himself should since he signed very name in agreement to recognize only the BCS Champ which was to put an end to split Champions once and for all.
Pete signed the agreement, as with all D1 coaches for their respective schools, & SC recognizes the AP as a split title with LSU, is this wrong?Didn't realize it was Pete Carroll that awarded USC that NC. Thought it was the AP?
Pete signed the agreement, as with all D1 coaches for their respective schools, & SC recognizes the AP as a split title with LSU, is this wrong?
Anyone else having issues with the Hoop this morning?
I had to dump FF and go to IE, then IE asked me to install an add on.
Seems to be working fine on IE now, but I never use this program.
You didn't answer my question. But to answer yours, my post was just in fun with Jim's about 'recognizing', I thought it fit enough, was fair enough, and was just funny enough.What does Pete have to do with it? For one, he hasn't coached at USC for 8 years. He didn't vote USC that NC (the AP is writers) and he didn't insist USC recognize it.
Additionally, while the BCS was better than the previous system, it certainly wasn't what it claimed to be and didn't do what it said it would.
If you have an issue, you should take it up with the AP, it was their vote.