THE PAC 12 THREAD v.3

[mcnabb7542]

He is clearly good enough on both sides though while today was really nice it was just Colorado. but even still UW's best RB.

Yes on all counts, it's pretty sad that they had to make a move like this, it will make it interesting at the combine, I still think he stays on the defense side for playing on Sundays...

 

[navamind]

Cal is a lot better this year.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

If he was on defense instead Colorado doesn't score as much as they did.

Easy to make blanket statements.

Why are you so sensitive? -- the Fox Sports guys were saying the same thing.

 

[TheDayMan]

Why are you so sensitive? -- the Fox Sports guys were saying the same thing.

Well, if the Fox Sports guys said it... :rollseyes:

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Well, if the Fox Sports guys said it... :rollseyes:

Have to think they know more about the game than a guy typing with one hand on the internet.

 

[TheDayMan]

Have to think they know more about the game than a guy typing with one hand on the internet.

Well there you go. Keep repeating them and you'll be the smartest guy on here...

 

[WizardHawk]

Why are you so sensitive? -- the Fox Sports guys were saying the same thing.

Wait, so my comments seemed sensitive to you? Really?

And yes, I heard those comments. Does that make it more true because some jackoffs on TV said it? Watch football much there sport? lol.

The fact is Shaq is the glue on that defense and it has shown how much he is missed over the last two games. His name is called A LOT when he is on that unit and their tackling and overall LB play isn't near as good when he isn't there. That is a fact. So if one of their top players is missing off that unit how is it not logical that they surely would have been better against their offense had he been on that unit?

 

[Ironbreaker]

You guys are arguing with a duck.

A dumb one at that.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

BEAVER!

QB SEAN MANNION!

THE BEST THAT EVER WAS IN THE PAC12!

EAT IT BITCHES!

 

[hokiehi21]

i just dont understand why UCLA is almost a TD favorite. Does Vegas know something we dont? Zona seems like free money

i've said this at least 5 times already this year, but I'LL NEVER DOUBT VEGAS AGAIN. They keep making me look stupid. (although they whiffed on the Oregon/Stan line, that was easy money)

 

[WizardHawk]

i've said this at least 5 times already this year, but I'LL NEVER DOUBT VEGAS AGAIN. They keep making me look stupid. (although they whiffed on the Oregon/Stan line, that was easy money)

the uw, sc, and oregon were all easy money. Almost everyone took them in the pick'em. Those were the easy games.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

Wait, so my comments seemed sensitive to you? Really?

And yes, I heard those comments. Does that make it more true because some jackoffs on TV said it? Watch football much there sport? lol.

The fact is Shaq is the glue on that defense and it has shown how much he is missed over the last two games. His name is called A LOT when he is on that unit and their tackling and overall LB play isn't near as good when he isn't there. That is a fact. So if one of their top players is missing off that unit how is it not logical that they surely would have been better against their offense had he been on that unit?

Played and coached at a higher level than either of you. Very easy assesment - Husky backs are so bad Coach P had no other choice and it was a good one. If he doesn't make the move Colorado beats UW. Your jelly of Oregon spews in damn near every post. Plus where did I say he wasn't missed on Defense?

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

You guys are arguing with a duck.

A dumb one at that.

When in doubt name call - c'mon now stretch the intellect.

 

[WizardHawk]

Played and coached at a higher level than either of you. Very easy assesment - Husky backs are so bad Coach P had no other choice and it was a good one. If he doesn't make the move Colorado beats UW. Your jelly of Oregon spews in damn near every post. Plus where did I say he wasn't missed on Defense?

lol, what does this conversation have to do with Oregon? It's amazing how you guys always bring that up. I didn't say a word about them and it has no relation to this topic. AT ALL.

And your opinion that the game would be a loss if #7 was on the other side of the ball is just an opinion. And one that lacks common sense as well as logic. Fine by me as dumb comments by duck fans is the rule around here, not the exception.

It's you that is obsessed here, not us.

 

[TheDayMan]

Played and coached at a higher level than either of you. Very easy assesment - Husky backs are so bad Coach P had no other choice and it was a good one. If he doesn't make the move Colorado beats UW. Your jelly of Oregon spews in damn near every post. Plus where did I say he wasn't missed on Defense?

Didn't the Fox Sports guys tell you why Shaq was moved to RB exclusively the past two weeks?

 

[Ironbreaker]

Played and coached at a higher level than either of you. Very easy assesment

You don't know jack shit.

Shaq is a game changer on the defensive side of the ball. Coaches HAVE to game plan for him. Putting him on the O makes their job easier.

Shaq had a great game. Against the worse run D in the conference. He played O out of necessity due to injuries.


The fact is no one know for a certainty how the game would have gone if he played D.

What we do know is the D is a different animal when he is in there, and the opposing coaches know that too.

 

[WizardHawk]

You don't know jack shit.

Shaq is a game changer on the defensive side of the ball. Coaches HAVE to game plan for him. Putting him on the O makes their job easier.

Shaq had a great game. Against the worse run D in the conference. He played O out of necessity due to injuries.


The fact is no one know for a certainty how the game would have gone if he played D.

What we do know is the D is a different animal when he is in there, and the opposing coaches know that too.

This is all they have. UW won their game so making up some kind of bullshit about how they could have/whould have/should have lost is all they are left with. They are all flat out obsessed over our games. We all know it's a very different game with #7 on the other side. Sure, UW wouldn't have scored as much, but then neither would Colorado. We know that with some fair amount of certainty as it's logical. Try explaining logic to a duck.

 

[WizardHawk]

Cal going to hold on for a pretty decent road win.

 

[TheLonestarDUCK]

You don't know jack shit.

Shaq is a game changer on the defensive side of the ball. Coaches HAVE to game plan for him. Putting him on the O makes their job easier.

Shaq had a great game. Against the worse run D in the conference. He played O out of necessity due to injuries.


The fact is no one know for a certainty how the game would have gone if he played D.

What we do know is the D is a different animal when he is in there, and the opposing coaches know that too.

UW doesn't have another player that would have been close to his performance today. Guess you can question Coach P and a Duck all you want. But it is blatantly obvious he was needed on O today. Congrats on your big win.

 

[Ironbreaker]

But it is blatantly obvious he was needed on O today. .

Of course it was needed. 2 of our RBs didnt play.

duh.