- Thread starter
- #41
MHSL82
Well-Known Member
Umm yea I would also pay him $18 mil a year, did you see what Alex Smith wants from the chiefs? He also wants $18 mil per year, and the chiefs have said they are willing to do $15. If Smith is worth $15mil per year then Kap needs to get his $18
I think Smith wants a higher guarantee do his agent is asking for more than he wants and will eventually compromise. It's too easy to move on with the rookie scale. There really isn't the risk you had before. Ith played well and was winning and was replaced - that's fine, but he was at the mercy of us trading him and doing so to a good fit for him.
He likely wants to start or be released - a big number would guarantee that. We were able to claim CK's 1.5 and AS's 8 were a reasonable QB cost (8.5) - we couldn't have if Smith were slated for 15. 15 would make teams know we had to release him, not just that it was best to trade or release him. He does not want to be at KC's mercy and if he is, he'd likely want someone serious enough to pick up a bigger contract.
There has been talk about not being a middle teir for QBs in price. You either are paid 18+ (old deals of 15M are the old before inflation version of the 18M standard) or you are a rookie scaled QB. Andy Dalton, Alex Smith, Kaepernick, and maybe Sam Bradford are next up on getting deals. None of them are getting Manning/Flacco money. All of them would rather play it out than getting near rookie pay. Too expendable and they have proven some.
Someone has to sign first and everyone else will ask for more. I think Kaepernick deserves it most and to be paid most, but he won't go first if he cares about relative pay. If these other three QBs play it out this year, CK might, too - partly in hopes of getting to Flacco money (but more sustainable)