BritishDolfan
Well-Known Member
- 5,479
- 1,071
- 173
- Joined
- Jul 21, 2012
- Location
- Hucknall, Nottinghamshire, England
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
There should be an 8 team playoff.
First team all-pro is an NFL accomplishment, not collegiate. Those are just as much a product of the NFL team they're on than what college they came from, if not more.I'll take quality over quantity. All these DBs churned out but how many First team all pros?
First team all-pro is an NFL accomplishment, not collegiate. Those are just as much a product of the NFL team they're on than what college they came from, if not more.
The real collegiate factories are the ones that repeatedly are putting kids into the pros, and nobody beats OSU in that regard.
FSU has put 3 QBs in the NFL this century, so they're not really in that discussion regardless.Think about how many QBs FSU has put into the pros in the last decade, even more so the first round. Wouldn't consider them to even be in the discussion as QBU because of the lack of success in the NFL.
When I consider a school **U, I factor in pro success because the success or lack thereof gets tied back to the school they went to.
I'll take quality over quantity. All these DBs churned out but how many First team all pros?
There should be an 8 team playoff.
FSU has put 3 QBs in the NFL this century, so they're not really in that discussion regardless.
Also, unlike FSU's QBs, OSU's DBs have had extremely good results in the pros.
Gotta disagree. The university isn’t responsible for their development after they leave for the NFL. If an NFL team sees enough potential to take a kid first or second round that tells me what I need to know about what the university did with them.
I'll take quality over quantity. All these DBs churned out but how many First team all pros?
To each their own. I believe their success is always tied to the university though.
Ah classic, graphic didn’t fit your agenda so ya moved the goal posts. Btw, Bradley Roby, Vonn Bell, and Marshawn Lattimore say hello.
To each their own. I believe their success is always tied to the university though.
I say that because when I point to Oklahoma’s lack of sending DB’s to the NFL OU homers love to point to Tony Jefferson. Now the guy is now one of the best safeties in the NFL but the dude went UNDRAFTED. I’d say it’s fair to say teams missed by not drafting him at all but if his time at OU had shown he was anywhere near even a third round pick there’s no way he would’ve gone undrafted. He is what he is because of hard work and NFL development. OU doesn’t get to claim shit about the money he’s made in the NFL. They had nothing to do with it despite what the homers want to believe.
Is it your belief future development to become all pro is more tied to college than there training at the next level? Then why do most college all Americans quickly peter out at the next level? Wouldn’t the NFL just be a league of college all Americans if what you said held true?
I won't disagree that their success in the NFL can be independent of their college success, but the school they went to will always point to their success when they're out recruiting, etc.
Absolutely, and Florida state has certainly done enough to point to all their dudes and say we can get you to the NFL and actually have some weight behind it. Ohio state can too. In the end y’all are quibbling about over very little. You can both make the same pitch to DB recruits and tbh you’re both DBU as far as I’m concerned.
I could also provide links on articles that claim FSU is DBU, and since yanno.. how the player actually plays in the NFL matters on how they are perceived?
Jalen Ramsey, Ronald Darby, Lamarcus Joyner, Xavier Rhodes, and Derwin James all say hello
Only problem with it now is Mickey Andrews is long gone and the DCs since have been fairly meh so the pitch of DBU is probably dying to the recruits