gkekoa
Well-Known Member
of course you go by the player. the player produced. CM produced at Carlona. The draft pick worked out, regardless of what the team records were.
Yes, redskinsfan said that, to take Bowers at #2 overall that is why I replied to him, then you chimed in. IMO its Illogical to take a TE that high in the draft. Even if we need one. If you are saying its logical to take a TE over a stud WR or LT like Alt if we are forced to make the pick at #2 and Peters doesnt like the Qb's, then we disagree.
It s never going to happen. Bowers at #2. If you find logic in this then that is your opinion. I disagree.
No argument the player produced but it proves my point that RBs should not be taken high…at all. pick has to lead to victories for it to work. There cannot be a steady decline in wins and call it a good pick.
redskinsfan…did you say you would take Bowers #2 overall? Would you trade down if possible and take him later if it is available?
Dean…you need to learn what nuance means. You still need to look up the word logical. I showed you the logic…we both disagree with the decision but there is logic in the pick of Bowers at 2. Logic is not an opinion.
Now to refute your statements…would you rather Travis Kelce or Mike Evans. I venture to say the top TE has been far more important than one of the top WRs. There are a lot of good WRs…there are very few consistently dominant TEs. The consistently dominant TEs in the modern era are Kelce, Gronk, and Kittle. I have seen plenty of question marks on Alt and each QB.
Now let’s play your McCaffery game…Would it be logical to take Bowers if he becomes the best TE in the game, while the QBs become Kyler Murray, RG3, and Jared Goff, and MHJ is AJ Green and Nabers is Crabtree and Alt becomes Duane Brown?