johnnytata
sugar booger
need to read the silmarillion again. but thats a book you need to be seriously psyched up to read. very dense. so many names/events to keep track of. but the genius of tolkien is nowhere more obvious.
need to read the silmarillion again. but thats a book you need to be seriously psyched up to read. very dense. so many names/events to keep track of. but the genius of tolkien is nowhere more obvious.
need to read the silmarillion again. but thats a book you need to be seriously psyched up to read. very dense. so many names/events to keep track of. but the genius of tolkien is nowhere more obvious.
Personally I approached reading the Silmarillion as more of a history book than a story. Which is pretty much what it is. Characters aren't fleshed out as much as in LOTR, but only because Tolkien passed before finishing his work. I can't even fathom the stories he could have given us had he 10 or 20 more years to write.
this is exactly what i tell people about the silmarillion too.
this is exactly what i tell people about the silmarillion too.
Now isn't the hobbit a prequel to Lord Of The Rings?