fightinfunbags
Well-Known Member
Very impressed with the Jokic flop on the Porzingas offensive rebound.Heck of an NBA finals preview if that’s what it ends up being.
Very impressed with the Jokic flop on the Porzingas offensive rebound.Heck of an NBA finals preview if that’s what it ends up being.
Very impressed with the Jokic flop on the Porzingas offensive rebound.
It’s a smart play. I don’t know why people hate on embellishing a call and making the whistle obvious and needed. He baited a lane violation too but officials fucked it up.Gotta do something to gain their attention after getting abused all night per usual.
What am I giving up for Brown? Because if its D'lo, this hurts the Lakers because they have no PG. Lebron can't do it all. Brown would be nice to have, but the Lakers need to have a PG on the roster too, whether that's D'Lo or somehow get Schroder back from Toronto in the Brown deal
SI dissolving after being sold..
So much good content lost in those TD's.
![]()
Yeah, it's a tough call on D-Lo because that slump or whatever it was he went through seems to be over, so he's getting to where he could actually almost be considered an asset in a trade. But, as you point out, they'd be without a PG. They'd have to be able to keep Reaves too.
If they did give up D-Lo for Brown, they could be ok, imo. Lebron seems to trust Reaves, so they can split the PG duties...but they would absolutely have to get Vincent back and he'd have play like he did for the Heat.
As someone who has seen Brown up close I just don't see how he's an upgrade over D Lo. He's great defensively. He's basic on O.
losing that PG hurts.
Murray or bust if I'm LA and I do everything I can to keep Reaves.
True. D-Lo and Brown are opposites. D-Lo is good offensively, but ranges from sieve to decent on defense.
Of the guys that it looks they could actually get, Murray is the only one I'd give up Reaves for.
I mean, you have to give up one of those mid level salaries to get a good return.
Vandy doesn’t make enough.
So, unless you juke someone into taking Vincent, that’s Reaves, Rui or DLo.
Every win, great team. Every loss, coach's faultBeat down by a Nets team that had lost like 9 out their last 10. But that's what happens your defensive game plan intentionally leaves people wide ass open to shoot 3s and you just decide to stop running any kind of actual offense in the 2nd half. Darvin Ham, ladies and gentlemen!
Every win, great team. Every loss, coach's fault
Find where I've said this is a great team. Darvin Ham has been trash all year and really his entire tenure. His game plans are terrible on both sides of the ball. His game management is atrocious. The Lakers win games because Lebron and AD have to play their asses off. Like All NBA 1st team level. If they can't do that on a given night, they lose.
I don’t think it is fair to go that far.
But as I said before, I just don’t see how he adds any value to a veteran team.
Does not make any sense for the Lakers to wait for him to “grow into the role”. They don’t have time for that.
And coaches are easily replaceable unless you are top tier. And highly unlikely Ham ever becomes that.
Reaves and Russell for Brown do not match salary wise anyway.....they make more then him.yea...if you guys gave up Reaves AND D Lo for Brown that would be a horrendous trade.