Mecca of the “B” Team
ClipGangOrDontBang
If It is....I think it’s both.
Shame on him and the Thunder.
If It is....I think it’s both.
I think the Thunders track record shows winning a game here or there isn’t the highest priority, they don’t deserve that. Standing by an employee, yeah that’s them.Agree.
But ...
Only if he's innocent.
If he isn't?
The Thunder pit winning games ahead of protecting children from a predator.
That's pretty fucking disgusting.
I posted the Oklahoma state law yesterday. She needs to be 18. 16 is the age of consent but it only applies if there is gap within 2 years of their ages. He would have needed to be 18 if she was 16.Am I missing some part of the allegations?
He is alleged to have banged a 15 year old sophomore, no?
Depending on be City/Srate/Country.....
If she was 16 or 17, it isn't illegal.
Disgusting?
Yes.
Illegal?
No.
If he can show when they met and she has a birth certificate, easy peasy....in this case.
As far as grooming kids, that's a different conversation.
Oklahoma law is not something that will play in this, I’m confident of that.I posted the Oklahoma state law yesterday. She needs to be 18. 16 is the age of consent but it only applies if there is gap within 2 years of their ages. He would have needed to be 18 if she was 16.
My guy....The only way this goes well for him is if they never had sex or if she was indeed 18 at the time they had sex. Unless some other poor girl got doxxed, she’s still in high school and not 18.
I have to be consistent, I said if he took the court yesterday the Thunder know it’s going away. Hopefully for Giddeys sake it’s a small enough issue that will happen. If he was looking for underage girls though it will bury him, as it should.My guy....
We aren't talking about 39 year old LeBron and a High School student.
Giddey is what?
21?
This is Kobe and Vanessa territory.
Frowned upon, sure.
Significant power imbalance due to fame and money.
But that doesn't make it ILLEGAL, which is the only issue here.
If that's the case, he's fucked.I posted the Oklahoma state law yesterday. She needs to be 18. 16 is the age of consent but it only applies if there is gap within 2 years of their ages. He would have needed to be 18 if she was 16.
You’re confident of that because the victim would likely be bought if it came to that. The state can prosecute without her cooperation but a conviction is nearly impossible without cooperation from the victim. It’s a solid move because that’s the level of plausible deniability people who don’t want to believe this is true need to pretend it never happened.Oklahoma law is not something that will play in this, I’m confident of that.
I’ve told you it looks like this may have happened in CAYou’re confident of that because the victim would likely be bought if it came to that. The state can prosecute without her cooperation but a conviction is nearly impossible without cooperation from the victim. It’s a solid move because that’s the level of plausible deniability people who don’t want to believe this is true need to pretend it never happened.
Why do you say that?Oklahoma law is not something that will play in this, I’m confident of that.
It is illegal though under Oklahoma law.My guy....
We aren't talking about 39 year old LeBron and a High School student.
Giddey is what?
21?
This is Kobe and Vanessa territory.
Frowned upon, sure.
Significant power imbalance due to fame and money.
But that doesn't make it ILLEGAL, which is the only issue here.
May have been California. If the law was involved in this in any way I doubt he would have played yesterday, that’s where I’m coming from. It’s not a legal matter.Why do you say that?
Did it happen in Australia?
Yeah, I don't put sports before women, kids etc.You’re confident of that because the victim would likely be bought if it came to that. The state can prosecute without her cooperation but a conviction is nearly impossible without cooperation from the victim. It’s a solid move because that’s the level of plausible deniability people who don’t want to believe this is true need to pretend it never happened.
It probably is being looked into QUIETLY.May have been California. If the law was involved in this in any way I doubt he would have played yesterday, that’s where I’m coming from. It’s not a legal matter.
What I’m saying, I’m confident enough in the organization that there is absolutely no way they would do that. I’ll be the first to call them out if they do, but in the world we live in people are way too quick to want this or that. Known facts at the time matter.Yeah, I don't put sports before women, kids etc.
The World would be a better place if it operated more like the Spurs, less like the Clippers, did in the Primo situation.
OKC definitely don't want to go full Clippers here.
You’re damning your own argument. You’re claiming a lack of facts. Ok. That’s why it needs to be investigated. Absent facts OKC took a huge risk letting him play.What I’m saying, I’m confident enough in the organization that there is absolutely no way they would do that. I’ll be the first to call them out if they do, but in the world we live in people are way too quick to want this or that. Known facts at the time matter.
Yeah....I’ve told you it looks like this may have happened in CA
I agree.You’re damning your own argument. You’re claiming a lack of facts. Ok. That’s why it needs to be investigated. Absent facts OKC took a huge risk letting him play.
If that’s true they have one side of the story. There hasn’t been enough time for them to get her version of events or the version of events from others who may have witnessed their interactions.I agree.
Not trying to captain save a hoe, rescue Ronnie here.
But, it is possible the Thunder have info that the general public does not.
Again: POSSIBLE, not probable.
Literally zero risk, I mean none. This is a professional organization here, it’s not Dolan or Morey having a bad day. Jeez.You’re damning your own argument. You’re claiming a lack of facts. Ok. That’s why it needs to be investigated. Absent facts OKC took a huge risk letting him play.