- Thread starter
- #1
But funny gif.
Oregon is 0-4 the past 4 seasons any game they've played vs a defense with a pulse, averaging less than 20 points a game. Get back to me when a giddy-up offense wins a natty.
-Oregon is 0-4 the past 4 seasons any game they've played vs a defense with a pulse, averaging less than 20 points a game. Get back to me when a giddy-up offense wins a natty.
In 2011 they beat Stanford and put up 53. Defense finished 28th. Auburn finished 60th. Oregon had 450+ yards and stoned inside the 5. Stanford finished 21st and they put up 52 on them. Clearly you are just cherry picking. If you are saying Oregon scores less pt vs good defenses than bad, than thank you for the heads up.2009 Boise 8 points. 2010 Auburn 19 points. 2012 Stanford 14 points. I think 2011 LSU was 23, don't remember. I know 2 TD's were in garbage time. Learn some football. I suppose only defensive players get tired vs the giddy-up and not the offensive players. Bottom line is Win Something.
2009 Boise 8 points. 2010 Auburn 19 points. 2012 Stanford 14 points. I think 2011 LSU was 23, don't remember. I know 2 TD's were in garbage time. Learn some football. I suppose only defensive players get tired vs the giddy-up and not the offensive players. Bottom line is Win Something.
2009 Boise 8 points. 2010 Auburn 19 points. 2012 Stanford 14 points. I think 2011 LSU was 23, don't remember. I know 2 TD's were in garbage time. Learn some football. I suppose only defensive players get tired vs the giddy-up and not the offensive players. Bottom line is Win Something.
2009 Boise 8 points. 2010 Auburn 19 points. 2012 Stanford 14 points. I think 2011 LSU was 23, don't remember. I know 2 TD's were in garbage time. Learn some football. I suppose only defensive players get tired vs the giddy-up and not the offensive players. Bottom line is Win Something.
Thanks. 0-5