- Thread starter
- #161
I gotta feeling they are looking for a mobile QB. Not sure Strong fits that.i am thinking strong in round 2
all he has to do is be able to roll outI gotta feeling they are looking for a mobile QB. Not sure Strong fits that.
He won 4,games the last yr he played . Didn’t see any “Elivating of players there . Didn’t see any carrying of a team there you expect of a franchise guy . Take his weapons away and he isn’t winning muchLook I'm not Watson or bust. Pickett, Corral, I'm all for it. I am also for Watson because he's a top 5 QB in his prime and will give us a chance to win every single Sunday.
You can't roll into AT&T next year with Heinicke and Trubisky and think you are gonna keep pace with that Cowboys offense.
Using the fact that the Texans won four games this year to minimize what Watson has done since he's been in the league is ridiculous imo. Respectfully
A top 5 qb needs to carry a team or he isn’t too 5 . And said price for that is highBut he did the two years prior. We really don't need Watson to carry this team. Anytime you have a chance to get a top 5 qb on your roster I think you gotta at least kick the tires.
Did the Pats winning 11 games the year Brady was out make you believe that Brady wasn't great?
The Vikings go to an NFC title game with Keenum and for the most part have played like ass with Cousins. Does that mean Keenum is better than Cousins? Of course not.
Sign me up for 4,800 33 and 7.