- Thread starter
- #21
Hatcher and Levuno are starters. Sharpton might challenge for a starting spot. IF we get Britt and Del Lapunte that is possible 5 starters.
Roberts has to be considered a starter as well. Just saying,
We didnt get any big name guys. BUt this might actually be a good thing.
What is a good thing is we didn't overpay for any big names with contracts we have to eat in a few years. The only big name that I wish we would have signed was Byrd. He is young and he is proven. There is no reason to expect that he won't produce through his entire contract. But even he was overpaid in my estimation. I'm very happy with how we handled this FA period. We were prudent and we picked up guys who are still hungry and have something to prove.
Hatcher and Levuno are starters. Sharpton might challenge for a starting spot. IF we get Britt and Del Lapunte that is possible 5 starters.
Add Jordan to that list, he could challenge at the other ILB and at the very least would play significant downs there.
1. As a team coming off of 3-13, we would likely have had to pay even more to retain Byrd than what he got.
2. Signing Byrd would basically signal that we had no hope for Thomas and Rambo.
So those being the semi facts, I have no problem with us not signing Byrd.
Not so sure about the signal for Thomas. Merriweather is a short term answer. Thomas can hopefully replace him next year as the SS. It gives him a year to complete his recovery and learn. Based on what we saw from Rambo last year, he may never be more than a backup. If he doesn't improve on his ST play, he may not even be that. He needs to make significant strides this year or it may be his last year here.
So we got Merriweather, Lauvao, Roberts, Jordan and Hatcher as starters signed
So five out of the what 7-8 FAs we signed are actually starters. Two of those five got semi hefty contracts. I dont see where the big uproar is coming from.![]()
Yea, but had we sunk those kinds of funds into Byrd, there is no way either of them see any playing time. Merriweather is a stop gap that allows us to se what if anything we have in Thomas without forcing him into a starting role coming off injury.
C- Only got backups and no starters so not thrilled with the signings plus the main need we needed was FS and we properly cant address that need in the 2nd round of the draft.
At this point, I give them a B for the players they have signed. Their strategy is an A but I do not like the age of some of the targets and some we have signed. The contracts have been well done and favorable for us and we now have options at ILB.
For all those complaining we haven't addressed every need with a sure-fire starter...that's how you overpay. Some are complaining about not signing Mike Mitchell but don't know what our offer was and his reason for going elsewhere or why we aren't targeting Chris Clemons. Maybe we don't like his age for his current price tag. We will go into the draft with a possible need here...maybe we will look at him after the draft...maybe they have faith in the two from last year...maybe they just didn't think much of those available this offseason.
I apologize if this was posted in another thread.
The Redskins Blog | CBS: Redskins FA Haul Receives ?A? Grade“Once upon a time, the Redskins were huge players in free agency. Now they are a lot smarter. They signed seven free agents and four of them should be starters: Defensive tackleJason Hatcher, receiver Andre Roberts, corner Tracy Porter and guard Shawn Lauvao. They also re-signed linebacker Perry Riley and corner DeAngelo Hall, two starters. I like what Washington did without a huge splash. Grade: A-”
Excellent post. The Redskins are not in a position to address everything. If things go well then perhaps over the next few offseasons they will be in a position to go after that big name that puts them over the top as a major contender. HTTR