SJ's 2015-2016 NFL prospect chat

[shopson67]

NO TRADE TO NUMBER ONE PLEASE!

I agree, unless the Titans are taking way under retail lol.

 

[SJ76]

I'd love Tunsil but not for a boat load of picks. No thanks.

 

[SJ76]

Cleveland will take Wentz at #2. Goff won't get past San Fran at #7 and Dallas could pull the trigger on him at #4 as well.

 

[Battlelyon]

 

[Battlelyon]

Cleveland will take Wentz at #2. Goff won't get past San Fran at #7 and Dallas could pull the trigger on him at #4 as well.

Yep, everyone is talking Rams Ravens trade.

 

[SJ76]

I like the comment in there about Rams 2017 and Deshawn Watson .

Tunsil would be great. I just don't see us giving up there farm for him. After the RG3 trade, even though we won.. We should have learned from that.

 

[shopson67]

I like the comment in there about Rams 2017 and Deshawn Watson .

Tunsil would be great. I just don't see us giving up there farm for him. After the RG3 trade, even though we won.. We should have learned from that.

Watson has been injured a lot, not the safest prospect to hitch your hopes to.

 

[SJ76]

Watson has been injured a lot, not the safest prospect to hitch your hopes to.

Last year? He came in during the 2014-2015 game at Florida St as a freshman and got hurt that year I believe, but the guy was just out of high school.


Define ALOT.. Because last year the guy was solid and if it wasn't for 2 BAMA special team plays, Clemson may have won a Natty. I expect him to not run as much next year and even less once he gets to the NFL. He's not Cam's size but who is?

Watson is a Randall Cunningham reincarnated. Big arm with speed, just needs some polishing. I'd take him right now over ANY QB in this draft.

 

[shopson67]

Cracked collarbone in 2014 spring practice, followed by a broken bone in his hand and ultimately a torn ACL later that season.

Of course he would be the #1 QB this year. He still does have his risks though.

 

[Retroram52]

This is nuts. Rather than staying put or trading down (as quite a few teams are trying to do in this draft), we are going to do something stupid with the Ravens to do what? Haven't we all suggested over and over to take BPA that got us Donald and Gurley? When will this front office get its head out of its ass. I guess we are headed for 7-9 again or if we are lucky, 8-8. Or then again, how about 4-12?

 

[shopson67]

I wouldn't get too wound up yet. So many rumors and smokescreens, not to mention writer fiction passed off as rumor this time of year.

 

[Retroram52]

Shopson. Never tell me to NOT to be wound up. I am always wound up, dude! Apparently, the Rams have a stiffy for either Goff or Wentz and are convinced one of them will fall to them if they trade up to 6. Thus the talks with the Ravens. This is a completely stupid idea from the get-go if it goes down. If Wentz and Goff are gone by 6, and they will be, the Rams will probably select Hargreaves who they had rated ahead of Ramsey.

 

[RamsFan88]

They won't trade unless one of them does fall. I doubt they make a trade before draft day.

 

[Retroram52]

You never know Rams88 with this FO.

 

[Clayton]

Shopson. Never tell me to NOT to be wound up. I am always wound up, dude! Apparently, the Rams have a stiffy for either Goff or Wentz and are convinced one of them will fall to them if the trade up to 6. Thus the talks with the Ravens. This is a completely stupid idea from the get-go if it goes down. If Wentz and Goff are gone by 6, and they will be, the Rams will probably select Hargreaves who they had rated ahead of Ramsey.

The rumor that has been floated for awhile is that the Rams like Wentz but the other rumor is that the Browns are still going to take Wentz because RG3 is more of a hail mary than a bankable commodity.

Rams trading up to 6 would make sense if the Ravens didn't need secondary help just as much as the Rams.

I wouldn't be shocked if the Rams traded up for Hargreaves with Goff still on the board. That would probably break the internet.

 

[Retroram52]

Many mocks have the Rams taking Connor Cook in the second but that scenario would disappear with a Ravens trade because we would probably lose one or both of our twos. Many reports indicate Goff will be a Brown and Wentz is probably going to be a Caboy. That would leave the Rams with neither. Then the Rams would have to go after Hargreaves or a number of LBs that have been prognosticated including Ragland and the backer form UCLA.

 

[RamsFan88]

It's looking like Wentz at 2 and Goff is a wild card. If he gets by the 49ers, he could fall.

 

[shopson67]

It's looking like Wentz at 2 and Goff is a wild card. If he gets by the 49ers, he could fall.

I doubt he gets past the Eagles though.

 

[shopson67]

If Wentz is still on the board when the Ravens pick, I'm on board with trading up. I'm a little less sure about Goff.

 

[bluepigpen]

I want them to stay put at 15 and go BPA and be done with it. They already have a QB problem and Mannion not tested. If anything at this point, I say go the other way and get more picks. Unless we see Mannion play I will always believe going after another QB in this draft in the first round especially trading up is not smart. Of course if one of the 3 QBs drop to 15 then if they think he is better than all 3 we have pull the trigger. If any of the 3 are drafted, they will start with a clip board. Just don't trade up please.