flyerhawk
Well-Known Member
"Potential" don't mean shit. Darko Milicic and Kwame Brown also once had potential.
Potential means something when you are talking about teams that are expected to be on the rise. That is the entire basis of determining who the rising teams are going to be.
Darko Milicic and Kwame Brown had potential until they started to play and it became obvious that they were fool's gold.
Joel Embiid is an all-star in his 2nd year. Ben Simmons is almost certainly going to be the RoY and should have been an all-star. Dario Saric is one of the more promising 4s in the league. This has already happened. Maybe Fultz turns into something special, maybe not. Maybe the guy the Sixers draft in the lottery will turn into something, maybe not. But they are already a really good team and a desirable location. Something that the Pacers aren't.
The Sixers were 17-19 in 2017 of this season. They are 29-11 in 2018 and 22-6 since March 1st. Which isn't surprising given they are the 2nd youngest team in basketball.
So, yeah, there are some pretty good reasons to be optimistic about this team. They may never win a title. Winning championships is difficult and there are 29 other teams looking to do the same thing. But your argument against them seems to amount to "well just because they have all this young talent doesn't mean they are going to win anything" which is true and obvious and pointless.