- Thread starter
- #421
It is a fair offer, but I love Hopkins. He's one of the few players I truly regret trading.
He can't afford his elite to come up lame for even a game or two. Booker is his best bench RB and David Moore (Seahawks) is his WR depth.Not a bad team, but RB and WR depth could be some serious issues. Nice to see someone has Hayden Hurst stashed.
Matt Ryan at 10th seems kinda low but I'd agree that the depth issues are pretty real there.
I don't think he's tanking, just in awe of the elite players and most likely not weighing the consequences for trading solid players away in a 16 team league. If it was a 12 team league, it'd be different.That's a YIKES. Tanking and playing for the future? I hate tanking with a passion, but I see this one coming.
16 team leagues aren't for everyone, but I like the challenge they present. Won't want to do a bunch of them, but a few are fun.Matt Ryan at 10th seems kinda low but I'd agree that the depth issues are pretty real there.
I'm not a huge fan of 16 team leagues, though. Too many variables in football to gut your depth by that much.
16 team leagues aren't for everyone, but I like the challenge they present. Won't want to do a bunch of them, but a few are fun.
Its a challenge, for sure, but also more luck dependent if all the players are equal.16 team leagues aren't for everyone, but I like the challenge they present. Won't want to do a bunch of them, but a few are fun.
Except for the Barbarians, all of my football leagues are 16 teamers. Funny, I never thought about it before.
Its a challenge, for sure, but also more luck dependent if all the players are equal.
For today's NFL, the sweet spot is probably somewhere around 12 team superflex imo. Although I'd be curious to hear what you guys think since I only do 1 or 2 Fantasy teams a year.