- Thread starter
- #1
Here's a interesting debate. Give me your thoughts.
Richard Sherman vs. Patrick Peterson: Superior NFL cornerback? - NFL.com
Richard Sherman vs. Patrick Peterson: Superior NFL cornerback? - NFL.com
Here's a interesting debate. Give me your thoughts.
Richard Sherman vs. Patrick Peterson: Superior NFL cornerback? - NFL.com
Peterson.
You basing this on what?
A) Big fan of Peterson, loved his performance of late or just believe he'll round out to be better?
B) Sherman hater and feel he's a no talented bum, with a big mouth?
C) Knee jerk reaction from a 49er fan when it comes to anything regrading Seahawks?
Relax, Harold. I hate Sherman, you should know that. He's a good cb but is he legal?
As for Sherman.......just keep your eye on him, I think he's going to really shine this year and yes he's going be legal.
Thats allways a question though isn't it? Are they legal or not?
![]()
Like Eric Wright?
Like Eric Wright?
One guy who wasn't on the 49ers when he tested postive?![]()
Unless you really think that trading for a cheater somehow makes it better.
Yes sir. Giving a guy a second chance on a NEW team is better than having a rash of positive PED tests on one team. This..... I would think..... would be considered just plain old common sense.
Thats always the question though. Is he legal or not? Who said that again?
LOL, yeah getting à 'second' chance with à new team after several teams have given up on you reflects much better than your original team sticking with you.......
Just admit it, without pretzal logic you would have no logic at all.