Sherman Peterson Tweet

[HaroldSeattle]

Patrick Peterson: The Numbers, The Tape, The Verdict 2014 | Pre Snap Reads

Peterson’s 2013 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 260
Failed coverages: 79
Shutdowns: 27
In Position: 154
Success rate for the season: 69.6%



Richard Sherman: The Numbers, The Tape, The Verdict 2014 | Pre Snap Reads

2013 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 238
Failed coverages: 52
Shutdowns: 35
In Position: 151
Sherman’s success rate for the season: 78.2%



But but but but Sherman never covers #1 WRs and Peterson covers the #1 WRs 199 % of the time


Sherman's success rates vs WR1

Marques Colston 5/5 (100%)
Nate Washington 9/10 (90%)
Chris Givens 7/8 (88%)
Andre Johnson 8/12 (67%)
Vincent Jackson 4/6 (67%)
Michael Crabtree 3/6 (50%)
Cecil Shorts 2/4 (50%)
Demaryius Thomas 4/4 (100%)
Larry Fitzgerald 6/10 (60%)
Total 48/65 (73.85%)

Peterson's success rates vs WR1

Marques Colston 6/7 (86%)
Nate Washington 5/7 (71%)
Chris Givens 8/13 (62%)
Andre Johnson 18/23 (78%)
Vincent Jackson 9/16 (56%)
Michael Crabtree 5/8 (63%)
Cecil Shorts 7/8 (88%)
Desean Jackson 10/13 (77%)
Steve Smith 11/17 (65%)
Calvin Johnson 11/17 (65%)
Total 90/129 (69.77%)


But but but but but Peterson is so versatile. He even covers WRs in the slot and surely does it better than Sherman

Sherman in the slot

Qualifying Plays in the slot: 23
Failed coverages in the slot: 7
Success Rate in the slot: 70%

Peterson in the slot

Qualifying Plays in the slot: 43
Failed coverages in the slot: 18
Success Rate in the slot: 58%




Any other questions or hypotheticals?

Where do you come up with these stats? Awesome post.

 

[Screamin12th]

I have a serious problem here. This list has Michael Crabtree as a WR1 but I am pretty sure team's don't put mediocre receivers at WR1.

But seriously, what are the TD, PD(Tip), INT numbers against the #1's?

 

[The Derski]

I have a serious problem here. This list has Michael Crabtree as a WR1 but I am pretty sure team's don't put mediocre receivers at WR1.

But seriously, what are the TD, PD(Tip), INT numbers against the #1's?

Who is SFs #1 if Crabtree is not? Boldin?

 

[SeattleCoug]

Who is SFs #1 if Crabtree is not? Boldin?

When healthy they are both similar at this point. Both have had a half season where they were Kaep's #1 target. IF they both play the whole year I bet their #'s will be similair. The way Seattle plays I dont think they will have a clear #1 either Harvin, Baldwin will probably be close as well. The Rams don't really have one either Austin, Britt and Givens are probably in the same mix. So that's 6 games where I dont think the whole shadowing the #1 receiver will mean that much.

 

[SeattleCoug]

Patrick Peterson: The Numbers, The Tape, The Verdict 2014 | Pre Snap Reads

Peterson’s 2013 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 260
Failed coverages: 79
Shutdowns: 27
In Position: 154
Success rate for the season: 69.6%



Richard Sherman: The Numbers, The Tape, The Verdict 2014 | Pre Snap Reads

2013 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 238
Failed coverages: 52
Shutdowns: 35
In Position: 151
Sherman’s success rate for the season: 78.2%



But but but but Sherman never covers #1 WRs and Peterson covers the #1 WRs 199 % of the time


Sherman's success rates vs WR1

Marques Colston 5/5 (100%)
Nate Washington 9/10 (90%)
Chris Givens 7/8 (88%)
Andre Johnson 8/12 (67%)
Vincent Jackson 4/6 (67%)
Michael Crabtree 3/6 (50%)
Cecil Shorts 2/4 (50%)
Demaryius Thomas 4/4 (100%)
Larry Fitzgerald 6/10 (60%)
Total 48/65 (73.85%)

Peterson's success rates vs WR1

Marques Colston 6/7 (86%)
Nate Washington 5/7 (71%)
Chris Givens 8/13 (62%)
Andre Johnson 18/23 (78%)
Vincent Jackson 9/16 (56%)
Michael Crabtree 5/8 (63%)
Cecil Shorts 7/8 (88%)
Desean Jackson 10/13 (77%)
Steve Smith 11/17 (65%)
Calvin Johnson 11/17 (65%)
Total 90/129 (69.77%)


But but but but but Peterson is so versatile. He even covers WRs in the slot and surely does it better than Sherman

Sherman in the slot

Qualifying Plays in the slot: 23
Failed coverages in the slot: 7
Success Rate in the slot: 70%

Peterson in the slot

Qualifying Plays in the slot: 43
Failed coverages in the slot: 18
Success Rate in the slot: 58%




Any other questions or hypotheticals?

Im saving this. Great find

 

[BamaCards1]

nobody cares

try talking football instead of shit that doesn't matter

Obviously you did
Quoting 1 part of a post doesn't quite add up to that. IF you're only here to talk trash then avoid my post.

 

[Logicallylethal]

Where do you come up with these stats? Awesome post.

I spent 72 hours straight watching film yesterday with Ron Jaworski

 

[WizardHawk]

Who is SFs #1 if Crabtree is not? Boldin?

Pretty sure he wasn't trying to suggest anyone else was their #1. It was a reference to Sherman calling him a sorry ass receiver and mediocre. So he was saying Sherman doesn't think he is their #1.

It's a joke man, lighten up.

 

[boogiewithstu2007]

Patrick Peterson: The Numbers, The Tape, The Verdict 2014 | Pre Snap Reads

Peterson’s 2013 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 260
Failed coverages: 79
Shutdowns: 27
In Position: 154
Success rate for the season: 69.6%



Richard Sherman: The Numbers, The Tape, The Verdict 2014 | Pre Snap Reads

2013 NFL Season Total:
Total qualifying plays: 238
Failed coverages: 52
Shutdowns: 35
In Position: 151
Sherman’s success rate for the season: 78.2%



But but but but Sherman never covers #1 WRs and Peterson covers the #1 WRs 199 % of the time


Sherman's success rates vs WR1

Marques Colston 5/5 (100%)
Nate Washington 9/10 (90%)
Chris Givens 7/8 (88%)
Andre Johnson 8/12 (67%)
Vincent Jackson 4/6 (67%)
Michael Crabtree 3/6 (50%)
Cecil Shorts 2/4 (50%)
Demaryius Thomas 4/4 (100%)
Larry Fitzgerald 6/10 (60%)
Total 48/65 (73.85%)

Peterson's success rates vs WR1

Marques Colston 6/7 (86%)
Nate Washington 5/7 (71%)
Chris Givens 8/13 (62%)
Andre Johnson 18/23 (78%)
Vincent Jackson 9/16 (56%)
Michael Crabtree 5/8 (63%)
Cecil Shorts 7/8 (88%)
Desean Jackson 10/13 (77%)
Steve Smith 11/17 (65%)
Calvin Johnson 11/17 (65%)
Total 90/129 (69.77%)


But but but but but Peterson is so versatile. He even covers WRs in the slot and surely does it better than Sherman

Sherman in the slot

Qualifying Plays in the slot: 23
Failed coverages in the slot: 7
Success Rate in the slot: 70%

Peterson in the slot

Qualifying Plays in the slot: 43
Failed coverages in the slot: 18
Success Rate in the slot: 58%




Any other questions or hypotheticals?

Fast break slam dunk! And that's the game!

 

[bksballer89]

Serious question: Who ever said Peterson is better?

 

[Logicallylethal]

Serious question: Who ever said Peterson is better?

For starters, Peterson himself has declared it numerous times. Most discussions have spawned from that.

As for who has said it in this thread? There's too many pages for me to skim through to remember who actually said it. But I know it has at least been implied with the arguments presented.

 

[cezero]

Obviously you did
Quoting 1 part of a post doesn't quite add up to that. IF you're only here to talk trash then avoid my post.

you said you'd pick a player over another due to something that has zero to do with the game.

it was stupid.

own your stupidity instead of bitching at those who point it out.

 

[bksballer89]

For starters, Peterson himself has declared it numerous times. Most discussions have spawned from that.

As for who has said it in this thread? There's too many pages for me to skim through to remember who actually said it. But I know it has at least been implied with the arguments presented.

I don't have any problem with Peterson saying it. You're suppose to believe that way as a player especially when you're a top 4 CB in the league. It's not like he's Dee Millner or something so I'm fine with that.

I just didn't know that posters actually stated that as well

 

[Screamin12th]

if you go by stats and success rating is Peterson even a top 5 CB? Maybe in 2012 ( 1 year out of 3 )

 

[BamaCards1]

you said you'd pick a player over another due to something that has zero to do with the game.

it was stupid.

own your stupidity instead of bitching at those who point it out.

That was only part of what I posted tinker bell. You are obviously just looking to be a dimwit and have nothing to offer. Move along.

 

[BamaCards1]

Why does it bother any of you in the first place? Some people do think PP is the better corner, while others like Sherman better. Like I said id take either of them and be happy. If PP was a Hawk and Sherman was a Card most of you would be saying PP was the better corner.

Let the season begin!

 

[jakedog56]

Why does it bother any of you in the first place? Some people do think PP is the better corner, while others like Sherman better. Like I said id take either of them and be happy. If PP was a Hawk and Sherman was a Card most of you would be saying PP was the better corner.

Let the season begin!

It is fine to have an opinion, but this is the Seahawks board so of course we are going to back Sherman.

Add to it that there is valid statisical data to show that he has been more productive then we have good reason to post our opinion that Sherman is better.

If you took away the names and teams, and just look at the data then this would not even be a discussion. Peterson may well be more athletic but he is not a better CB.