- Thread starter
- #1
Love the commentor that posted the stats that PP was the 50th ranked corner in the league last year! lol
Also saw on the ticker the PP will no longer be playing offense or returning punts.
He will still shadow number 1 receivers.... and according to the stats get beat much more often then he wins..... lol
Sherm just all up in his head.
Peterson gets beat much more often than not? Say what?![]()
Compared to Sherman yes.
Saw a good tweet. Sherm and PP combined to allow 8 TDs last year.....7 of which were off PP
Lol. Dude gets a contract and immediately has to call up Sherman.
~in his head~
Yes and Peterson is always on the #1 receiver. Sherman is not. Sherman is also surrounded by more defensive talent.
I hear this BS all the time in defending PP. If that is the case, shouldn't our #2 CB, Maxwell be getting lit up by all of the #1's he has to face?
Before you say that is because ET covers for BW, it is also said that ET covers for Sherm.
Yes and Peterson is always on the #1 receiver. Sherman is not. Sherman is also surrounded by more defensive talent.
Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?
Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?
Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?
Sherman initiated this particular twitter beef with the retweet about TDs allowed. So it would appear Sherman immediately felt the need to "call up" Peterson.
wasn't it Cody Swartz that brought up the TD ? i did not see a Sherman post about it. But As soon as Cody said something the PP got bent. Truth hurts.
I said RETWEET.