• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Sherman Peterson Tweet

Sharkonabicycle

Bipedal Sea Dog
36,537
12,429
1,033
Joined
Jul 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.12
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Pat Peterson is an idiot. And now what is it... some other clown is saying he's best in game (can't remember who it was).

Whatever. I've seen Pat Peterson and Sherman play, I'll take Sherman. Neon Deion also said Sherman is the best in game and his opinion is probably the most valuable out there (considering he's widely considered the best to ever play the position).
 

blstoker

Bill Bergen for HoF!
14,293
2,882
293
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
WA
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,816.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

dude82

Well-Known Member
3,013
330
83
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Location
Washington
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Sherman's response was perfect.
 

gowazzu02

Well-Known Member
2,838
82
48
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Love the commentor that posted the stats that PP was the 50th ranked corner in the league last year! lol

Also saw on the ticker the PP will no longer be playing offense or returning punts.

He will still shadow number 1 receivers.... and according to the stats get beat much more often then he wins..... lol

Sherm just all up in his head.
 

The Derski

No Fat Chicks
38,839
6,124
533
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Location
Tucson, AZ
Hoopla Cash
$ 418.10
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Love the commentor that posted the stats that PP was the 50th ranked corner in the league last year! lol

Also saw on the ticker the PP will no longer be playing offense or returning punts.

He will still shadow number 1 receivers.... and according to the stats get beat much more often then he wins..... lol

Sherm just all up in his head.

Peterson gets beat much more often than not? Say what? :scratch:
 

gowazzu02

Well-Known Member
2,838
82
48
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Peterson gets beat much more often than not? Say what? :scratch:


Compared to Sherman yes.

Saw a good tweet. Sherm and PP combined to allow 8 TDs last year.....7 of which were off PP
 

SonnyCID

Conocido Miembro
9,626
892
113
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Lol. Dude gets a contract and immediately has to call up Sherman.

~in his head~
 

The Derski

No Fat Chicks
38,839
6,124
533
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Location
Tucson, AZ
Hoopla Cash
$ 418.10
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Compared to Sherman yes.

Saw a good tweet. Sherm and PP combined to allow 8 TDs last year.....7 of which were off PP

Yes and Peterson is always on the #1 receiver. Sherman is not. Sherman is also surrounded by more defensive talent.
 

The Derski

No Fat Chicks
38,839
6,124
533
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Location
Tucson, AZ
Hoopla Cash
$ 418.10
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Lol. Dude gets a contract and immediately has to call up Sherman.

~in his head~

Sherman initiated this particular twitter beef with the retweet about TDs allowed. So it would appear Sherman immediately felt the need to "call up" Peterson.
 

Uhsplit

Well-Known Member
9,456
2,778
293
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 805.92
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yes and Peterson is always on the #1 receiver. Sherman is not. Sherman is also surrounded by more defensive talent.

I hear this BS all the time in defending PP. If that is the case, shouldn't our #2 CB, Maxwell be getting lit up by all of the #1's he has to face?
Before you say that is because ET covers for BW, it is also said that ET covers for Sherm.
 

The Derski

No Fat Chicks
38,839
6,124
533
Joined
Jul 11, 2013
Location
Tucson, AZ
Hoopla Cash
$ 418.10
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I hear this BS all the time in defending PP. If that is the case, shouldn't our #2 CB, Maxwell be getting lit up by all of the #1's he has to face?
Before you say that is because ET covers for BW, it is also said that ET covers for Sherm.

Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?
 

SonnyCID

Conocido Miembro
9,626
892
113
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Yes and Peterson is always on the #1 receiver. Sherman is not. Sherman is also surrounded by more defensive talent.

Peterson is a much more talented defense than most.

And he is not "always" on the #1. More than Sherman, yes, but 55% is not always.

And how is that an excuse for giving up 7x more TDs? Seriously, that's just a lame excuse.
 

Logicallylethal

Well-Known Member
4,767
275
83
Joined
Jul 2, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 933.33
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?


That's the flawed logic in everyone's argument against Sherman.

The Seahawk's defense works because of the scheme and the players playing their role and doing it effectively. Why should Sherman go against his team's scheme? So he can appease fans and doubters like you?

Lol at the end of the day Sherman cares about winning. The Seahawks defense works perfectly with the role Sherman is playing. When he is needed to follow and shadow a receiver (like week 2 on Boldin after Boldin had just gone for 208 yards) he does it and he completely shuts them down (1 catch 7 yards for Boldin)

If you really think Sherman is one dimensional you haven't truly watched him play.
 

SonnyCID

Conocido Miembro
9,626
892
113
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?

Because it works. Why change it just to make your narrative seem plausible?

History remembers who is better base on results, not who should have been better based on hypotheticals A,B or C.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gowazzu02

Well-Known Member
2,838
82
48
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Im just saying if Sherman is so freakin god like why not match him up with more #1's? He played on the same side of the field 99% of the time. If Sherman is the #1 CB in the game why is he so one dimensional?


because our defense is the best in the league (was last year) playing the way it did. See superbowl domination vs best offense in league history.

Sherm eliminates the entire left side of the field. Brees, Kap and Manning through to that side of the field a combined 8 times in the playoffs......................
 

Screamin12th

Well-Known Member
6,658
1,363
173
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 6,290.90
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Sherman initiated this particular twitter beef with the retweet about TDs allowed. So it would appear Sherman immediately felt the need to "call up" Peterson.

:wtf2:

wasn't it Cody Swartz that brought up the TD ? i did not see a Sherman post about it. But As soon as Cody said something the PP got bent. Truth hurts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Screamin12th

Well-Known Member
6,658
1,363
173
Joined
Apr 22, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 6,290.90
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I said RETWEET.

and? So he retweeted something someone else said. Big deal. The fact of the matter here is Sherman is a better CB than PP, Numbers prove this. In less passing attempts against Sherman he has more INT's and more Passes Defended. PP is a great Athlete and a very good CB but he is no Sherman. PP will get his chance to get on Sherman's level or he will just cake walk now that he got paid, this is the big test for both these players now.
 
Top