forty_three
Stance: Goofy
On a separate note Sid is skating with his linemates and on the first PP unit, so this seems to really be happening.
I wonder if we're going to see any soft focus features on Sid's toughness and will to win on NBCSN?
On a separate note Sid is skating with his linemates and on the first PP unit, so this seems to really be happening.
I wonder if we're going to see any soft focus features on Sid's toughness and will to win on NBCSN?
Only one lamppost and one fire hydrant allowed per line.The only thing stopping Crosby now are the lampposts on either side of him.
A strength they had all season was running out 4 good lines. Going back to 6 defense and 12 forwards might be a good change also.
As you stated having OV with Eller might be very good with the way Eller is playing.
As a Penguins fan the more Orpik the better!Or Trotz can pull a Bowman and put him on defense. Can he be much worse than Orprik?
And I really think the bigger Caps lineup stuff is with the defense. Carlson-Orpik pairing makes my heart soar. Not only have you tied an Orpik anchor to your best defender, you've also guaranteed more ice time for Orpik. I'm sure it's because he said something dripping in veteran leadership.
While that pairing is dumb, Carlson is our 3rd best D-man behind Orlov and Nisky.
RE Forward changes, I don't mind it. In theory you get OV with Eller who is creating space for chances left and right and put Burrakovsy on a line where he isn't "the guy". However, I do think it's a bit silly because those 2 lines haven't played much together all season long (3:01 for 8-20-43 and 5:47 for 65-19-77)
Only one lamppost and one fire hydrant allowed per line.
While that pairing is dumb, Carlson is our 3rd best D-man behind Orlov and Nisky.
RE Forward changes, I don't mind it. In theory you get OV with Eller who is creating space for chances left and right and put Burrakovsy on a line where he isn't "the guy". However, I do think it's a bit silly because those 2 lines haven't played much together all season long (3:01 for 8-20-43 and 5:47 for 65-19-77)
Why did they include a fans comment in the report where he said "its absolutely unacceptable behavior whether he was drunk or not." Yeah, it's fucking r*pe, guy. We all know it's unacceptable. And the "drunk or not" part gives me pause because it makes me think you stopped for a second and were like 'well, he was drunk... hmmm, no... that shouldn't be a difference. this is still bad.' And what question prompted that response? Weird comment, and weird reporting.
What was Sid so upset about on that Caps goal?