- Thread starter
- #1
Well, if DiPoto likes him then I like him. I'm willing to give DiPoto unconditional trust - at least for a couple seasons anyway.Thoughts?
What do you mean, "again"? As far as I can tell, they never finished.The Mariners have to rebuild again.
Thoughts?
Well, if DiPoto likes him then I like him. I'm willing to give DiPoto unconditional trust - at least for a couple seasons anyway.
Tough to be too excited... Sounds like a puppet that will do whatever Dipoto wants him too... I don't like the fact that he has zero managerial experience in MLB either...
Yea I have no idea if this will work or not. We have no idea about his ability to manage a baseball team. The positive I take is that there at least seems to be a plan in place where as there wasnt before. Dipoto brings in two guys that he knows well and should be on the same page with. It's a formula that could pay off years down the road. If it doesnt, oh well it cant get worse.
Why this guy now? You already had McClendon, who I think is a fine manager. It's not his fault nearly every player who comes here as a free agent takes a dip in hitting production, and it's certainly not Lloyd's fault that Jack Z's regime gave him pretty much nothing from the draft or player development except Kyle S. If DiPoto likes this Servais guy so much -- who has no experience -- why not just hire him in a front office capacity and see what happens with a 3rd year under McClendon? That way you get a little continuity and 'your' guy waiting in the wings and already under hire. This constant do-loop of hiring and firing leaders every couple years is counter-productive.
McClendon and Dipoto wold not have been a good mix.
I put this in the same category as criticizing playcalling in football. We only grouse about the ones that don't work and make the assumption that we had a better option. Lloyd had this team 1 game from the playoffs last year, and I have a tough time believing he was the reason pretty much everyone but Cruz started off slowly this season. I think DiPoto would have been wise to exercise a little tactical patience, but if he's 100% certain that McClendon wasn't the guy and Servais is then I'll give him full credit if it works out.... and I'll be awfully unimpressed if we're at the foot of another 7 year plan.McClendon also was not a great manager. We went through more lineup changes than any other team in baseball (my opinion) and his in-game management skills were limited. I agree Jack didn't help him out much, but he was not the future for this team and I am happy to see a change take place. This team needs energy and I hope the new regime gives us that because the old one did not.
I agree that a constant hiring and firing of managers is counter productive. I had similar views of keeping LMC when DiPoto was first hired as just an ease of transition sort of thing. But after learning more and more about DiPoto I realized it was not smart to keep LMC around any longer. They have very different views about how to operate a baseball team IMO. Also I think DiPoto views Servais as a long term option (which is sorta sketchy considering he has no managerial experience). This should be the start to continuity at the manager spot, hopefully. I think for DiPoto it came down to picking a guy that would implement his system the best and McClendon was not that guy. No reason for DiPoto to keep LMC around for another year if he didn't see him being the manager the following seasons.Why this guy now? You already had McClendon, who I think is a fine manager. It's not his fault nearly every player who comes here as a free agent takes a dip in hitting production, and it's certainly not Lloyd's fault that Jack Z's regime gave him pretty much nothing from the draft or player development except Kyle S. If DiPoto likes this Servais guy so much -- who has no experience -- why not just hire him in a front office capacity and see what happens with a 3rd year under McClendon? That way you get a little continuity and 'your' guy waiting in the wings and already under hire. This constant do-loop of hiring and firing leaders every couple years is counter-productive.