chucksker
Chuck Member
"everyone agrees" russel Wilson woulda been a top 10 pick had he been 6-2?!?!
Maybe it's just me but I haven't heard that ONE SINGLE TIME
Maybe it's just me but I haven't heard that ONE SINGLE TIME
It just makes me laugh that THAT wisconsin offense is the best in B1G history.
We saw better offenses in the Big 12 on a weekly basis. Just sayin.
Again, that just isn't true. Our QB had the SINGLE HIGHEST PASSER RATING in NCAA HISTORY. Our RB scored 39 TDs, which tied the NCAA record (and though Sanders did it in less games, he also had more carries). We only had 10 turnovers all year, and half of them were committed by the second string. Our 44 PPG is a huge number, especially considering that we are a clock eating offense who doesn't strike quickly. It's too bad that nobody effectively tracks efficiency in football like Pomeroy does in basketball, because if they did, I feel pretty confident we would be right up there with all time greats.
I also think NFL evaluators prove how good our team is. Going starter by starter:
Russell Wilson (3rd round draft pick. Nearly everyone agrees he would have been a top ten pick had he been 6'2 or taller. 6th QB drafted)
Montee Ball (Projected 2nd-3rd Round pick, ranked as top 5 RB prospect)
Bradie Ewing (Fifth Round Pick, #1 FB Drafted this year)
Nick Toon (4th round draft pick, 18th WR off board)
Jared Abbredaris (Projected 3rd-4th rounder)
Jacob Pedersen (Projected 3rd round pick)
Josh Oglesby (Undrafted due to chronic knee concerns, but was Consensus First Team All B1G)
Kevin Zeitler (First round draft pick, #2 OG off the board)
Peter Konz (Second Round pick, #1 C on the board)
Travis Frederick (Projected First Rounder, #1 Ranked OG in next class)
Ricky Wagner (Projected First Rounder, #2 Overall according to McShay, #1 or #2 OT in class)
So that gives us:
- Three players drafted in first or projected to go in first
- A fourth who is universally considered to have the skill set of a first rounder
- Two others taken or projected to go in second
- Three either taken in third or projected to go in third
- One taken in fourth and one in fifth
- Four guys considered the best at their position in their class
- Only player not taken or projected to be taken in first five rounds was Consensus All-Conference Player
I'd be interested in seeing how many Big 12 offenses can match up with the results and pedigree of our offense. My guess is that there aren't very many.
"everyone agrees" russel Wilson woulda been a top 10 pick had he been 6-2?!?!
Maybe it's just me but I haven't heard that ONE SINGLE TIME
Also, while they may not have many High draft picks, it's impossible to argue that Texas tech and Oklahoma haven't had some of the most lethal offenses in the country over the past few years
'07 Kansas had a better offense than '11 wisconsin.
Not even close. They didn't face any elite defenses until their bowl game, but still had 28 or less twice (and another in the bowl game). We played several elite defenses (PSU, MSU x2, and Illinois) and our lowest was a 28 point output in the middle of a windstorm. Plus, talentwise it's a no-contest. We might literally be better at all 11 slots.
LOL 2 calling anything at Illinois elite
Not even close. They didn't face any elite defenses until their bowl game, but still had 28 or less twice (and another in the bowl game). We played several elite defenses (PSU, MSU x2, and Illinois) and our lowest was a 28 point output in the middle of a windstorm. Plus, talentwise it's a no-contest. We might literally be better at all 11 slots.
It's so hard to take you seriously with some of the shit you say.
For real.
And quit acting like how many players were drafted matters so much. You know better than that.