- Thread starter
- #1
Jim Rome is Flaming
Check that, Chris Everett
Very simple question. Which do you think should be given more weight in terms of bids and seeding in the NCAA Tournament? Should a team that looks good but has a lackluster resume get bids over a team that plays sloppy or boring, yet has a superior resume?
Take for example VCU's final four team a couple of years ago. They probably should have been in the NIT based on resume (in my opinion) but the eye test and their exciting style of play got them a bid.
Take for example VCU's final four team a couple of years ago. They probably should have been in the NIT based on resume (in my opinion) but the eye test and their exciting style of play got them a bid.