• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

Redskins are back?

Iggloo

Fly, Eagles Fly
24,276
9,664
533
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Again, to be clear here, the OP is a little misleading. No one is talking about bringing back the name Redskins. What is apparently on the table is bringing back the logo of the Native American (which no one opposed or considered disrespectful).

I do think the name Redskin is racist. If you read about the history of the term, it is crystal clear that it was a derogatory term, even if not all Native Americans took offense to it being on a football team logo. For a lot of Native Americans, the name and logo were cool, because they validated their existence and they were personally fans (and let's face it, the team used to be very good back in the Jack Kent Cooke era).
 

Rowdy

Well-Known Member
7,291
2,939
293
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 12,607.31
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Again, to be clear here, the OP is a little misleading. No one is talking about bringing back the name Redskins. What is apparently on the table is bringing back the logo of the Native American (which no one opposed or considered disrespectful).

I do think the name Redskin is racist. If you read about the history of the term, it is crystal clear that it was a derogatory term, even if not all Native Americans took offense to it being on a football team logo. For a lot of Native Americans, the name and logo were cool, because they validated their existence and they were personally fans (and let's face it, the team used to be very good back in the Jack Kent Cooke era).
The name was first introduced by the redskins themselves
 

wazzu31

Never go full Husky
25,686
7,567
533
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Location
Sumner
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Again, to be clear here, the OP is a little misleading. No one is talking about bringing back the name Redskins. What is apparently on the table is bringing back the logo of the Native American (which no one opposed or considered disrespectful).

I do think the name Redskin is racist. If you read about the history of the term, it is crystal clear that it was a derogatory term, even if not all Native Americans took offense to it being on a football team logo. For a lot of Native Americans, the name and logo were cool, because they validated their existence and they were personally fans (and let's face it, the team used to be very good back in the Jack Kent Cooke era).
But who cares what they think. Football is an American sport not a Native sport. The 49ers and Cowboys should be a hell of a lot more offensive than the Redskins.
 

UK Cowboy

Happy Father's Day T-Roy
33,891
11,282
1,033
Joined
Aug 9, 2013
Location
Longview, Texas
Hoopla Cash
$ 1.36
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I never understood how KC stayed the Chiefs(as they should) and the Skins changed their name. Ridiculous
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
134,429
57,228
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I never understood how KC stayed the Chiefs(as they should) and the Skins changed their name. Ridiculous
That tracks. You not knowing why 'chief' is less offensive than 'redskin' is entirely predictable.
 

packerzrule

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain
32,891
13,362
1,033
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Oak Creek WI
Hoopla Cash
$ 30.38
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Pretty badass of you
like a boss swag GIF
 

Hbomb

Mobile Member
2,239
634
113
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 8,500.36
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That tracks. You not knowing why 'chief' is less offensive than 'redskin' is entirely predictable.
It’s actually more than that. They still do the tomahawk chop and chant.
 

Darrell Green Fan

The Voice of Reason
24,950
7,312
533
Joined
Sep 2, 2014
Location
Mount Airy MD
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
for the ten thousandth time. Warriors and the old helmet with the spear or better yet, this logo was just too damn logical.

it don't matter to me, they all stink in our Nations Capitol. Blind leading the blind and nobody has a single finger in anyones belt loop.
That was my suggestion years ago but it is a tradmark issue with the Golden State Warriors.
 

BeaReylo

Well-Known Member
1,428
698
113
Joined
Feb 14, 2015
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I never understood how KC stayed the Chiefs(as they should) and the Skins changed their name. Ridiculous
The Chiefs are winning and still have fan support. Snyder kept The Redskins in the dumps for twenty years until fans stopped caring about the team. When sponsors started to feel pressure from groups, they pulled threatened to pull ads which made Snyder have to change the name to keep revenue coming in.

That isn't going to happen to KC because they're popular; The Blackhawks because they're still riding off of their 10's dynasty and if any sponsors pull out others will gladly step in to cash in because there's a passionate fan base who will rally around those teams. Snyder atrophied The Redskins base with constant losing and no hope in sight of change so there was support to back up the franchise.
 
Last edited:

Black Adam

Cowards WILL BE cowards..
72,124
28,582
1,033
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
The other side of the mirror
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I never understood how KC stayed the Chiefs(as they should) and the Skins changed their name. Ridiculous
Well according to the history of the franchise Lamar Hunt actually named the team what he did for a political friend of his, who's nickname happened to be Chief...

No, I don't feel like looking the guy up lol...
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
134,429
57,228
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
That was my suggestion years ago but it is a tradmark issue with the Golden State Warriors.
How so? Lots of team names are used by teams in different sports (Giants, Cardinals, etc)
 

msgkings322

I'm just here to troll everyone
134,429
57,228
1,033
Joined
Aug 11, 2010
Hoopla Cash
$ 4,700.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The Chiefs are winning and still have fan support. Snyder kept The Redskins in the dumps for twenty years until fans stopped caring about the team. When sponsors started to feel pressure from groups, they pulled threatened to pull ads which made Snyder have to change the name to keep revenue coming in.

That isn't going to happen to KC because they're popular; The Blackhawks because they're still riding off of their 10's dynasty and if any sponsors pull out others will gladly step in to cash in because there's a passionate fan base who will rally around those teams. Snyder atrophied The Redskins base with constant losing and no hope in sight of change so there was support to back up the franchise.
Also 'chief' and 'Blackhawk' simply aren't offensive the way 'redskin' is.
 
Top