Jakology
I don't give a fuck
Cam is just doing well because of his run game and defense.
I sense sarcasm.
Cam is just doing well because of his run game and defense.
You stated I was in a camp of fans who can't 'ever' seem to criticize Andrew Luck, when I did. It's a fact. It proves you wrong. Deal with it.
I choose Andrew Luck, period. I originally chose him, and I still do...much like most NFL GM's and coaches would. You don't like it. Deal with it.
You didn't actually criticize him though. You stated a universally accepted fact, that Andrew Luck played badly. That is not a criticism, it is a fact.
1. Russell WilsonOK. Season is over. Has anyone's view changed on any of the QBs?
1. Russell Wilson
2. Cam Newton (5)
3. Derek Carr (2)
4. Andy Dalton
5. Andrew Luck (3)
6. Jameis Winston
7. Blake Bortes (NR)
8. Marcus Mariota (7)
9. Tyrod Taylor
10. Teddy Bridgewater
I think its pretty safe to say that Cam had a pretty good year with fairly lackluster weapons.
I would tier Wilson and Cam together and then I would probably put the next 6 in the next tier. For me, 3-8 are really close. Luck is going to be banged up for most of his career...he takes more hits than any QB.I'd say that list is a pretty good reflection of the performance of QBs last year.
I don't think I could drop Luck down that far given he was injured for most of the year but he wasn't playing well when he did play so that should be a factored in.
That seems nuts to me. I'd take Cam over Wilson only because he is a year and a half younger but Winston and certainly Mariota need to prove more to enter that conversation.My Top 10: Based on who I would build a team around
1)Cam Newton
2)Winston
3)Mariota
4)Wilson
Well Winston won Rookie of the year. Both are younger and to be honest Im not very high on Wilson like some are. He has played with the Best Defense in the league. He has struggled a little in the last 2 years in the playoffs. Dont get me wrong I think Wilson is good and I would take him on my team Im just not as high on him as some are. I rather have the 2 younger guys who looked good playing on bad teams.That seems nuts to me. I'd take Cam over Wilson only because he is a year and a half younger but Winston and certainly Mariota need to prove more to enter that conversation.
Good defense or not, Wilson is still averaging 8.1 yards per attempt and 8.4 yards per attempt in the playoffs and manages to get 38 rush yards a game. Wilson did have a bad game against Carolina but Winston had 6 INTs against Carolina and generally padded his stats against Jax, Wash and Philly.Well Winston won Rookie of the year. Both are younger and to be honest Im not very high on Wilson like some are. He has played with the Best Defense in the league. He has struggled in the last 2 years in the playoffs. Dont get me wrong I think Wilson is good and I would take him on my team Im just not as high on him as some are. I rather have the 2 younger guys who looked good playing on bad teams.
Well if you saw both of my posts you would see that them being younger helps. Im not saying they are better right now then Wilson. Stop being a homer. I Both players play on bad teams and have done well so far. Their upside and age is what I like about them.Personally I was surprised that purguy had Wilson as high as he did. I'm guessing he figured that was as low as he could reasonably put him and get away with it.
I like how he puts two guys above him that have all of zero playoffs snaps based on Wilson's, a Super Bowl winner, playoff performances over the past 2 years.
Yeah but he was a Rookie. Did wilson win rookie of the year? Again its just my opinion. Im just not as high on Wilson as some are. I would rather take the upside and youth of those 2 over Wilson. Wilson having the best D has helped him in a major way. Again this is no Bash on Wilson so dont make it like that. I do think he is a good QB and he is in my Top 4 so I dont see an issue.Good defense or not, Wilson is still averaging 8.1 yards per attempt and 8.4 yards per attempt in the playoffs and manages to get 38 rush yards a game. Wilson did have a bad game against Carolina but Winston had 6 INTs against Carolina and generally padded his stats against Jax, Wash and Philly.
No, but Bradford didDid wilson win rookie of the year?
Well if you saw both of my posts you would see that them being younger helps. Im not saying they are better right now then Wilson. Stop being a homer. I Both players play on bad teams and have done well so far. Their upside and age is what I like about them.
Bradford is pointless in this conversation. Again Im looking at if Im building a team and I would pick the Upside of those 2 and youth over Wilson. I know what these 2 QBs can so with a bad team. I dont know what Wilson can do with a bad team. Imagine if Seattle had a bad to avg D these last couple of year. Wilson might be out of the league now or just an Avg QB. No one knows. He was thrown into a perfect situation. This year we saw the D dip a little and BOOM they went 10-6. Big difference then the last 2 years.No, but Bradford did