flyerhawk
Well-Known Member
Exactly. I think there is a correlation, but not necessarily a meaningful one at all times. Even OL and DL. The reviewer doesn't know if the DL's responsibility was one gap or two gap or if a DE crashed down on a certain play because the LB had containment responsibilities. Also, when one DE plays T Smith twice a year and another plays a lesser tackle, they will grade out lower because they will do worse in those two games against T Smith. Like if a CB follows the best WR for the other team all game. His job is just that much harder. It's still way too subjective for my taste.
No question that there is a ton of subjectivity to it. But there is no way around that in football because it is such a complex interconnected sport.
So I appreciate the effort. I just don't get the value of grades that based on limited plays such as the ones for secondary players. Those grades are based almost SOLELY on 3 or 4 plays all game and a corner who is constantly targeted and does well is graded higher than a corner that is completely ignored.