PAC 12 Thread v6.0

[AlaskaGuy]

Pac-12 All-Academic - Stanford University

In addition, Stanford had 21 on the conference's all-academic honorable mention.

Since when did 'honorable mention' count?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

@AlaskaGuy is definitely beneath a Stanford grad who is currently a teacher on here, one of the most honorable professions in this fucked up country today.

he makes it easy to hate Huskies.


nice prose here whiz and spot on…your a reason i love the huskies. Keep up the good work and happy holidays to you and yours.

You have Jonathan Smith as your HC ... I win.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

You have Jonathan Smith as your HC ... I win.

1ST TEST COMES ON YOUR BOWL GAME…

2ND TEST comes on the Beavers 1st game next fall…


you have no win yet kid.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

1ST TEST COMES ON YOUR BOWL GAME…

2ND TEST comes on the Beavers 1st game next fall…


you have no win yet kid.

It was a win for all Huskies the moment it was announced that OSU hired Smith.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

It was a win for all Huskies the moment it was announced that OSU hired Smith.

i know that OC JS was your fall guy for the past 3 years instead of execution by the kids on the field…GL2U on that line of thinking.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

i know that OC JS was your fall guy for the past 3 years instead of execution by the kids on the field…GL2U on that line of thinking.

Tell me more about Washington football.

 

[trojanfan12]

I tend to agree with Wiz re: bowl selection. Sure, the point of the bowl is to reward teams for their season and based on being North Division champs and winning the head to head, Stanford probably should rate a better bowl game than the Huskies, despite having 2 more losses. Stanford has a better SOS and their best win is better than Washington's best win.

However, we also know that these bowls are about making money. That comes from asses in seats and eyeballs on tv sets. While Washington being "known for their bowl travel" is news to me, it seems that Stanford often has trouble getting folks to travel to their own stadium, let alone to a bowl game in another state. Selection committees will weigh that...fairly heavily.

Asses in seats and eyeballs on tv sets is largely why USC ended up in the Rose Bowl last year over Colorado despite not winning the South, let alone the PAC. Winning the head to head just provided the selection committee with a decent excuse other than money.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

Tell me more about Washington football.

why hasn't Cal OC doug baldwin been hired as your OC yet?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

why hasn't Cal OC doug baldwin been hired as your OC yet?

Good question but then again why wasn't Smith fired after the ASU game.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

Good question but then again why wasn't Smith fired after the ASU game.

A: because HC sweet P knows more than you.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

A: because HC sweet P knows more than you.

Because of Smith's play calling vs ASU, UW didn't play SC in the PACCG last Friday night.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

Because of Smith's play calling vs ASU, UW didn't play SC in the PACCG last Friday night.

failed response AG… (see box score link below)


washington vs Stanford this year

 

[AlaskaGuy]

failed response AG… (see box score link below)


washington vs Stanford this year

You're actually comparing the ASU loss vs the loss against Stanford? lulz

 

[mrwallace2ku]

You're actually comparing the ASU loss vs the loss against Stanford? lulz

so your teaM failed to stop ASU from scoring points….seems like a defensive problem in the desert this year. I watched that ASU game and ya gotz yer ass kicked.


MAN UP AND OWN IT!

 

[AlaskaGuy]

so your teaM failed to stop ASU from scoring points….seems like a defensive problem in the desert this year. I watched that ASU game and ya gotz yer ass kicked.


MAN UP AND OWN IT!

I'll show you a box score that tells a story. Of course you'd have to have a clue about football to understand.

Washington vs. Arizona State - Box Score - October 14, 2017 - ESPN <---- first stat you want to look at on here is 'Total Carries' for UW so you can see Browning had four less carries than Gaskin. Then you want to scroll up and check out Browning's QB stats including his QB rating.

Gaskin
Coleman
Ahmed

 

[mrwallace2ku]

ASU 13 Washington 6 …lulz.


everybody and their brother would have picked the points over here…ASU played a hellva ballgame that night, you lost.

own it.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

I'll show you a box score that tells a story. Of course you'd have to have a clue about football to understand.

Washington vs. Arizona State - Box Score - October 14, 2017 - ESPN <---- first stat you want to look at on here is 'Total Carries' for UW so you can see Browning had four less carries than Gaskin. Then you want to scroll up and check out Browning's QB stats including his QB rating.

Gaskin
Coleman
Ahmed

yeah, Browning was off that game, what's yer point?

OC JS's fault? lolz @ U.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

yeah, Browning was off that game, what's yer point?

OC JS's fault? lolz @ U.

Smith is the OC. When you have the likes of Gaskin, Coleman, and Ahmed in your stable vs one of the shittiest run defenses in the conference and your QB has 10 of the measly 31 carries in that game it tells a story. Again you'd have to have some knowledge about college football including those three RB's to understand ... so that leaves you out.

 

[mrwallace2ku]

Again you'd have to have some knowledge about college football including those three RB's to understand ... so that leaves you out.

UWUB had no 2nd half response?

the ultimate blame falls w/ your HC…how long have you been watching football since your immigration to the US from Ukraine fool?

 

[WizardHawk]

@AlaskaGuy is definitely beneath a Stanford grad who is currently a teacher on here, one of the most honorable professions in this fucked up country today.

he makes it easy to hate Huskies.


nice prose here whiz and spot on…your a reason i love the huskies. Keep up the good work and happy holidays to you and yours.

I admit to not reading all of whatever exchanges they had. I do ignore posts so there's that.

I don't hate all nebraska fans because of brasky, nor all wisconsin fans because of GD, etc. I sure hope others feel the same about AG and the rest of us. I think too many take AG too literally or otherwise too seriously as it is. He likes to stir the pot no doubt, but he can and will keep it real and even give credit to teams he doesn't like. That's more than I can say about quite a few other somewhat toxic posters on this site. If people would stop letting him get under their skin there wouldn't be half the issues with him that keep coming up over and over. He is what he is and he isn't going anywhere so...