Maybe $C should "leave" until Larry Scott it tarred and feathered then come back.
Or USC could tar and feather Larry Scott.

Maybe $C should "leave" until Larry Scott it tarred and feathered then come back.
Weird, at the beginning of the year he said he was gonna stay...
@AlaskaGuy, didn't you make a bet about where he'd go in the draft?
You know that fan that de committed the other day from the Ducks said the same thing !
LOL. I didn't write the article. I didn't even comment on it. But putting up stats from the previous six seasons as proof is pretty funny considering what USC has accomplished. Oh and in this past decade USC won two Rose Bowls ,five 10 or more win seasons and finished in the top 5 three times while under sanctions for a good part of that time . I would say thats pretty close to being the second best team in the conference in that period while being "garbage" lol
2 rose Bowls and a Fiesta for Oregon in the last decade.*Edit- In this past decade USC has won 3 Rose Bowls ( I forgot last season) or to put it in perspective more than Oregon has in 100 years of football. So if USC was "garbage" this past decade do they even have a word to describe 100 years of Duck football ?
2 rose Bowls and a Fiesta for Oregon in the last decade.
also the overall record for USC is 3rd best not 2nd.
falseYes while USC was "garbage" . USC won all their Rose bowls this past decade.
Pretty sure USC has more Rose bowl victories this "garbage " decade than the Duck have all time. That's pretty sad.
false
How far off am I?
I just checked. If you count the 1916 Rose Bowl win Oregon has three total all time Rose Bowl wins in a 100 years. Or equal to USCs "garbage" last ten seasons. You should be proud.
3 Rose Bowl wins for USC in 10 years. 3 Rose Bowl wins for Oregon in 100 years.
Does this mean Oregon is 1/10th the program USC is?
![]()
Well, the conference has gone way up in revenue under him and that's part of the problem. He has a lot of support from the member institutions because of those numbers. Sure, we can all agree they should be better and not being able to get the Direct TV thing resolved in all of these years is just plain bad. There are a lot of things to be critical about, but until the schools feel that way he's not going anywhere. Unfortunately.I'd be an honorary Trojan for the day just to help. Dude has to go if the conference is going to thrive.
Well, the conference has gone way up in revenue under him and that's part of the problem. He has a lot of support from the member institutions because of those numbers. Sure, we can all agree they should be better and not being able to get the Direct TV thing resolved in all of these years is just plain bad. There are a lot of things to be critical about, but until the schools feel that way he's not going anywhere. Unfortunately.
Well, the conference has gone way up in revenue under him and that's part of the problem. He has a lot of support from the member institutions because of those numbers. Sure, we can all agree they should be better and not being able to get the Direct TV thing resolved in all of these years is just plain bad. There are a lot of things to be critical about, but until the schools feel that way he's not going anywhere. Unfortunately.
Preaching to the choir here guys. I think most of us want to see Scott gone. I just doubt that's going to happen anytime soon given at least what the public praises are from the presidents and staff of these schools.