Olyduck
Fast Hard Finish
Winning and dominating are not the same.lol
Just because during most of Pete Carroll's tenure only PAC teams seemed to be able to beat us, doesn't mean we didn't dominate the conference.
USC was a combined 10-7 in conference in Pete Carroll's 1st and last years
In between though?
USC was 52-7 in conference and went 27-0 in the PAC from Oct. 4, 2003 to Oct. 14, 2006.
Seems pretty dominant to me.
2001 and 2009 as you said blah ok so ignore those
2002 was a solid year one loss one close win co champs. are dominant teams co champs
2003 one loss. pretty dominant other wise
2004 one loss and 3 close wins not dominant
2005 was an ass kicking on the conference
2006 2 losses and 3 close wins not dominant co champs
2007 2 losses and 3 close wins not dominant co champs.
2008 1 loss and 1 close win.
so of 7 years between 3 not dominant. 2 for sure. 1 probably and 1 with a co championship i have a hard time calling it dominant.