Darkstone42
Oh.
I've never said there's no god; tough to say who created the universe, who created god, and who created nothingness.
But are we really to believe that if there is a creator - who's supposedly of some kind of human image - he'd actually expect anyone to believe any of the obvious, illogical nonsense posited in the bible? Believing that the earth is 6,000 years old and the Noah's Ark story is just wolley-minded thinking at best.
My gut feeling is that apart from a lot of the bible being simply the product of some peoples imagination -- conjured up out of thin air, some of it is done from a true trolling perspective. I think someone had a good laugh at everyone's expense, 2,000 years ago.
We'll never know, I suppose.
The Bible largely follows the mold of religious texts of its time (and "its time" is a really broad statement, mind you). Take the inexplicable and explain it in terms that people can understand.
I was taught (in Catholic school, mind you) that a great deal of the Bible is to read as an analogy or a fable, not as historical fact. But every story is rooted in fact. Noah's ark? There was a massive flood in Mesopotamia, which was, at the time, and to those who lived there, the entire world. The flood was devastating, wiping out human, plant, and animal life. And then most of the Hebrews conquer someone, someone conquers the Hebrews stuff is based in actual events.
But when there was doubt about how or why these things happened, they put it into terms they could understand.
We're still trying to solve the problem of how the world was created. We just have more precise methods now.
Most Christians by dogma don't believe the world is only 6000 years old, or that we're all descended from Adam and Eve though some massive ince$t party. It's just he fundamentalists, who happen to be the most outspoken, who believe that.
There's plenty of room for both science and Christianity in a person. I know there is in me.