- Thread starter
- #1,241
dash
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy bacon
The UAE & Qatar have similar track records and those regimes have owned major soccer clubs for years and while there was some controversy when big stars started signing for those clubs you don't really hear a peep about it anymore.
Yeah, there's no denying that's true. The problem is once you open the door and the money starts flooding in, it's difficult if not impossible to turn off the taps.
Getting back to Phil though (as he is the lightning rod), when you say something on the record and then decide to join the organization/regime that you've openly criticized a few months earlier, you're just inviting the blowback.
But, taken at face value, Mickelson’s view is more complicated. The six-time major champion admits the Saudis have a detestable human rights record, but also thinks the PGA Tour needs competition. In a February interview with the website The Fire Pit Collective, Mickelson said the Saudi government are “scary motherfuckers” who murdered Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, have a “horrible record on human rights,” and “execute people… for being gay.”
This is the same golfer who said last week that joining LIV is a “once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to reshape how the PGA Tour operates.”
Golfers weigh Saudi abuses with the PGA's monopoly power
Phil Mickelson cares more about challenging the PGA than standing up to the Saudi government
qz.com