elocomotive
A useful idiot.
Well, there's no outrage on Beagle's hit because he isn't Ovechkin.
As someone who has coached for a really long time who has taught kids as young as 7 that a prime rule is if you see numbers, you don't hit... Hits like this one irritate the shit out of me. And the fact that certain status players never get punished for it is maddening. Herb Brooks called it the assholes and eyeballs rule. If you see his eyes, make the hit. If you see his ass, get between him and the puck. Neutralize him without the hit.
There is no reason to make that hit, or the borderline one on Werenski last week. The puck is gone, the player is mostly neutralized. Get between him and the puck and move on. But if the refs have proven they aren;t going to punish it, why not go for it?
And I am probably picking on Ovechkin a bit because of his taking out Werenski. But he's not the only star who gets away with this. Perry and Getzlaf are fucking masters of it. And at least it's sort of a hockey play and not sticking someone in the nuts behind the play ala Marchand and Crosby.
True Dat.
OV has been suspended a few times already, so I'm not sure how relevant that is to him. I personally think the star power factor in suspensions is overstated, though Crosby's actions the other week certainly show the league is inconsistent at times. It's a high speed games and mistakes happen and while Ovechkin has been reckless at times, we've seen very little of that in the past 5-6 seasons. He had a few suspensions and his behavior has changed since then. The hit on Werenski was 100% legal (in timing, point of contact, etc.) and unfortunately just resulted in an injury. If you watch the replay, he is straight on facing Ovechkin as OV hits the end line and he turns to make it shoulder to shoulder. Look at OV facing him, that's not homerism, these are objective facts.
Part of the problem with the NHL's suspension policy is that it bases things on results (whether a player is injured) or whether a penalty was called at the time, rather than the intent and the violation of game rules. Intent should be the #1 factor because changing intent is really the only way to change the culture.
I get tired of players going after guys for legal hits. Beagle did that after a legal hit on Wilson against Boston, just like Hartnell did it to OV after a legal hit on Werenski.
At the end of the day, the NHL has to continue to be more consistent and the punishments need to be more significant if you want to change behavior. They made clear head shots were a problem a few seasons back and enforced as such. I think we've seen a change in that. They've made improvements, but there is a long way to go still.