Ohio State = 2006 champions

[BoiseStateFan27]

them and Michigan were the "best two teams" before the bowls thus they should have played each other

 

[bone3421]

yup i agree......ohio st. is now the 2006 natinal champ

 

[Smoke]

+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

 

[BoiseStateFan27]

obviously I'm just poking fun, but really this is the exact same situation but yet when the SEC school was on the other side they got in

now when it's two SEC schools they make sure to put them in

the BCS system seems like it's literally fixed to help out the SEC schools only

a lot of the times they give the SEC school the easier opponent if it's a battle between two opponents

if you question me you might ask why Auburn got left out in 2004

well that's easy, if they got blown out by USC the SEC wouldn't be unbeaten in championship games

I know it seems like I'm reaching but this seriously seems like the case right now

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Congrats Ohio state

 

[Iron My Jorts]

Not really the same situation. UF was 12-1. Michigan was 11-1.

 

[goDAWGSsicem]

Moral of the story is...

SEC = :charlie:

 

[BoiseStateFan27]

Not really the same situation. UF was 12-1. Michigan was 11-1.

Florida was better

but Michigan had the better "body of work"

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Moral of the story is...

SEC = :charlie:

whore abusing crackheads ?

 

[goDAWGSsicem]

Winning sir, winning.

 

[Iron My Jorts]

Florida was better
but Michigan had the better "body of work"

Before the bowls, UF had 3 wins against ranked teams. Michigan had 2.

http://espn.go.com/college-football/rankings/_/year/2006/week/15

 

[goDAWGSsicem]

You know this rematch is actually somewhat of a result of that situation... The same people (ESPN/AP) who were butthurt about not getting a Michigan/OSU rematch, pimped this rematch until it happened.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Winning sir, winning.

right craig james is the whore abusing crackhead.....allegedly

 

[BoiseStateFan27]

Before the bowls, UF had 3 wins against ranked teams. Michigan had 2.

2006 NCAA College Football Polls and Rankings for Week 15 - ESPN

yes I know that Florida had more ranked wins

but Michigan had the better "body of work"


I know Florida was the better team

but Michigan had the better "body of work"

 

[BrawlinHawkeye]

Before the bowls, UF had 3 wins against ranked teams. Michigan had 2.

2006 NCAA College Football Polls and Rankings for Week 15 - ESPN

This year Okie St. had 4 wins against ranked teams and Alabama had 3. Alabama is going and not Okie St?

 

[TigerBait1971]

obviously I'm just poking fun, but really this is the exact same situation but yet when the SEC school was on the other side they got in

now when it's two SEC schools they make sure to put them in

the BCS system seems like it's literally fixed to help out the SEC schools only

a lot of the times they give the SEC school the easier opponent if it's a battle between two opponents

if you question me you might ask why Auburn got left out in 2004

well that's easy, if they got blown out by USC the SEC wouldn't be unbeaten in championship games

I know it seems like I'm reaching but this seriously seems like the case right now

 

[bchampy]

I don't like the results of the BCS, but 71% of the coaches with votes voted Alabama #2.

Of course you can expect that from SEC coaches(Pinkel voted them #2 as well. Trying to fit in already lol).

What surprised me is that Chris Petersen of Boise St voted Alabama #2 as well, while putting his own team 5th.

Stanford's Shaw also put Alabama @ #2 and OSU @ #3, ahead of his own team after crying about the rankings a week or two ago.

How does any of this makes sense?

 

[Iron My Jorts]

This year Okie St. had 4 wins against ranked teams and Alabama had 3. Alabama is going and not Okie St?

Don't ask me.

 

[bchampy]

I don't like the results of the BCS, but 71% of the coaches with votes voted Alabama #2.

Of course you can expect that from SEC coaches(Pinkel voted them #2 as well. Trying to fit in already lol).

What surprised me is that Chris Petersen of Boise St voted Alabama #2 as well, while putting his own team 5th.

Stanford's Shaw also put Alabama @ #2 and OSU @ #3, ahead of his own team after crying about the rankings a week or two ago.

How does any of this makes sense?

Bump.

 

[axisoftime]

agreed. solid post